Investigating market power in the Belgian pork production chain

Abstract

Belgian pork production has faced stagnating prices for decades. It remains unclear whether excessive market power from slaughterhouses or meat retailers has played a role in this trend. While market power studies can reveal some of the market dynamics in this setting, this type of research has not yet been applied to the Belgian pork market. The present paper investigates oligopolies and oligopsonies in the pork production sector. We build a new model that focuses on market power dynamics in the market for live pigs and distinguishes horizontal and vertical market power parameters, both for pig farmers and for slaughterhouses. The results follow from an empirical application using unique slaughterhouse data for 2001-2015. The results indicate that the farmers benefit from a significant power advantage in the live pig market, when very modest price demands are taken as a reference. The final market price of live pigs approaches the price requested by the farmers. On the other hand, the measured vertical market power also suggests that a pig farmer does not receive the (modest) full-wage-based salary. The market power of the slaughterhouses is also limited. Market power as a result of collusion-that is, horizontal market power-is present, but is not strong. However, there are significant differences between the slaughterhouses in terms of markup on the input prices. These differences reflect differences in company strategy, and this diversity further reduces the possibility to create sector-wide collusive behaviour.

Market power and sustainability: a new research agenda

“…In Porter's work market and industry structure are key factors that determine the potential profitability of a business [83]. Market structure is commonly part of market power estimations [84][85][86]. Thus, it can be argued that the responses brought up by Laszlo and Zhexembayeva [64] are common themes within market power research.…”

Corruption and Inflation in Agricultural Production: The Problem of the Chicken and the Egg

“…The second reason is the sublimated importance of these goods for emerging economies, where the weight of agricultural production is significantly greater than the weight of agricultural production in the gross domestic product of industrialized or tertiary economies. Additionally, these economies have important oligopolistic structures linked to the production and distribution of agricultural goods (Maes et al 2016). As a result, it is important to look with special attention to the agricultural sector if we intend to study in detail the link between corruption and price developments.…”

Estimating the degree of market power in the vegetable market in Japan

“…However, despite these criticisms, the original model by Azzam (1996) is still advantageous because the model is simple and highly extensible, requiring fewer data. Recently, this model has been applied to the US beef processors and retailers (Chung, Eom, and Yang 2014), the Belgian pork production chain (Maes, Vancauteren, and Van Passel 2019), and international trade of agricultural commodities (Yamaura and Xia 2016). In addition, KSK extended this model to simultaneously estimate the vertical and horizontal competition among three stages in the Japanese milk market.…”