2014
DOI: 10.1108/jap-11-2013-0045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating models of adult safeguarding in England – a mixed-methods approach

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology being used in a study exploring the organisation of adult safeguarding. Design/methodology/approach -A mixed-methods study is presented which describes how the research team is seeking to identify models of adult safeguarding and then compare them using a quasi-experimental study design. Findings -Close examination of this study's methodology highlights the potential value of mixed-method research approaches. Research limitations/implications -A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2014 ; Norrie et al . 2014 ; Trainor, 2015 ). Research suggests that reactive and technical approaches to risk management and safeguarding are inadequate for addressing the complex circumstances and individual needs (Manthorpe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2014 ; Norrie et al . 2014 ; Trainor, 2015 ). Research suggests that reactive and technical approaches to risk management and safeguarding are inadequate for addressing the complex circumstances and individual needs (Manthorpe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article reports the first phase of the study which sought to identify the different models of safeguarding currently employed in local authorities in England. These models, which are largely descriptive, formed the basis for the second and third phases of this study investigating the potential effects of different organisational models of adult safeguarding (Norrie et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase one consisted of a literature review and interviews with senior safeguarding managers in 24 local authorities (Norrie et al 2014). Phases two and three involved in-depth analysis of five local authorities, which were selected to represent the different models of safeguarding.…”
Section: Models Of Safeguardingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after critical reflection, we combined two of the 'Dispersed Specialist' models, which meant that two sites were identified as operating a 'Dispersed Specialist' model. Phase two involved a staff survey (Norrie et al 2014) and secondary analysis of Abuse of Vulnerable Adult (AVA) returns (now Safeguarding Adults Returns), Adult Social Care Survey data, and an analysis of cost estimates provided by safeguarding managers. Phase three consisted of interviews with a wide range of stakeholders (See Figure 1) in the five sites.…”
Section: Models Of Safeguardingmentioning
confidence: 99%