A real rejuvenator
must have the ability to disaggregate oxidized
asphaltene nanoclusters. However, few studies pay attention to the
topic, and there is a lack of comparison of the disaggregation ability
of different rejuvenators. Thus, the disaggregation ability and regeneration
mechanism of three bio-rejuvenators (waste cooking oil (WCO), waste
wood oil (WWO), and straw liquefied residue oil (SLRO)) on oxidized
asphaltene nanoclusters were studied in this paper. Laboratory tests
and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were used to compare the effectiveness
of the three bio-rejuvenators and reveal its corresponding mechanism.
It is found that these bio-rejuvenators have a softening effect on
aged asphalt binder, but not all of them can disaggregate oxidized
asphaltene nanoclusters. The introduction of WWO and WCO can effectively
disturb the nanoclusters caused by the increase of polar functional
groups during the oxidation process. The effect of WWO is more significant,
but neither of them can restore the asphaltene dispersion to the virgin
asphalt binder. SLRO has an adverse effect on the disaggregation of
oxidized asphaltene nanoclusters. WCO, WWO, and SLRO showed different
disaggregation mechanisms, including ″pull-out, intercalation,
and compression″, respectively. WCO and WWO can increase the
activation energy reduced by aging in a short aging time, and SLRO
makes the activation energy lower. Such findings can help enterprises
screen more reasonable rejuvenators to facilitate the recycling of
reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials and promote the sustainable
development of the construction industry.