2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Peltzman effects in adopting mandatory seat belt laws in the US: Evidence from non-occupant fatalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before presenting the model, the linear autoregressive (AR) process is firstly introduced. e AR model describes the random variables at some time by using the linear combination of random variables at earlier time as equation (1). It is a common form of time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before presenting the model, the linear autoregressive (AR) process is firstly introduced. e AR model describes the random variables at some time by using the linear combination of random variables at earlier time as equation (1). It is a common form of time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many factors, the traffic law is considered an effective measure to reduce the severity of injuries and the number of fatalities as a means of macroeconomic regulation and control. Some existing studies have analyzed the impact of certain traffic laws on the number of traffic accidents, such as the seat belt law [1], driving under the influence (DUI) law [2,3], and alcohol control law [4]. However, the dynamic impacts of these traffic laws on traffic accidents have not been adequately studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, drivers may feel that enforcement is only limited to major highways, thus, they are unlikely to receive a violation. Finally, as seatbelt use becomes more prevalent, drivers may underestimate the risk of injury from distracted driving because of increased protection “Peltzman effect” (Lv et al 2015 ). Further research is needed to explore the underlying causes and possible interventions to reduce mobile phone use among drivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the drivers are less concerned and worried about traffic safety. Another explanation is that drivers believe if they are in danger, CV technology would promptly remind them how to avoid a crash; thus, they have a lower risk perception about dangerous situations [58].…”
Section: A Differences In the Responses Between Non-cv And CV Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%