2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Perceived Task Urgency as Justification for Dominant Robot Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Cluster Analysis of the participants' responses to the open question on why they preferred either one of the robots revealed that the humanoid was mostly appreciated for the categories personality and approachability (8 times mentioned), lifelikeness (6), entertainment (4), pleasantness (3), and aesthetics (3). The non-humanoid was preferred for matching with its functionality (3) and not being distracting (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Cluster Analysis of the participants' responses to the open question on why they preferred either one of the robots revealed that the humanoid was mostly appreciated for the categories personality and approachability (8 times mentioned), lifelikeness (6), entertainment (4), pleasantness (3), and aesthetics (3). The non-humanoid was preferred for matching with its functionality (3) and not being distracting (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When transparent reasoning is given, a service robot, therefore, can offer effective behavior modification. Giving a justification and explanation for a robot's behavior was also found a factor to mitigate reactance and lead to higher compliance with a robot's cue in the works of [2] and [6]. Additionally, following Agrawal and Williams's suggestions (2017), emphasis should be put on developing robot behavior that ensures safety, so that people develop a sense of trust in the robot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to Principles 2.1 and 2.2, cues should be more explicit by adding context if time permits. Justifying a robot’s behaviour can mitigate reactance and lead to higher compliance with the cue ( Babel et al, 2020 ; Boos et al, 2020 ). The design implications considering comprehensive cues can be summarised as follows:…”
Section: Method—model Formalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social responses to a robot’s cues can be influenced by personal factors such as an individual’s trusting beliefs in a robot ( Ghazali et al, 2020 ), robot-related factors such as the sophistication of a robot’s social cues ( Ghazali et al, 2019 ), as well as environmental factors such as a robot’s task at hand ( Boos et al, 2020 ). When evaluating HRI of robots deployed in public space, researchers encounter two main constraints: Firstly, a robot’s human interaction partners are primarily encountered by chance and their internal states, traits and beliefs often remain unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation