Investigating Policy Instrument Adoption in Low-Carbon City Development: A Case Study from China

Abstract

Based on policy instrument theory and a case of low-carbon city development (Qihe County in Shandong), this study examined the policy instruments adopted for low-carbon city development in China and the effectiveness of these instruments. All the policies adopted by the piloted city from 2008 and 2014 were collected, coded, and analyzed. A two-dimensional analytical framework was developed based on a trichotomous policy instrument categorization and low-carbon city connotation. The results showed that the key goal of China’s low-carbon city construction is to develop low-carbon technology and low-carbon energy. Compulsory policy instruments are the most used and most effective, while voluntary policy instruments are rarely used. Further results indicated that when the ratio of compulsory instruments and mixed instruments comes to 2:1, the combination of policy instruments can lead to the optimal completion degree. It seems difficult to balance the stability of various policy instruments with the overall high completion degree. Chinese local governments are more accustomed to compulsory policy instruments. This reminds policymakers to pay more attention to the potential of voluntary instruments and mixed instruments in building low-carbon cities.

Consumers’ Intention and Cognition for Low-Carbon Behavior: A Case Study of Hangzhou in China

“…There are some articles on low-carbon emission reduction from the perspective of the government [34], and this paper is from the perspective of residents. With the development of a low-carbon economy, residents' values gradually turn to green values.…”

The Implementability of Low Carbon Cities in Thailand: A Case of Hat Yai City Municipality

“…The ideology adopts two conceptual frameworks, i.e., low carbon society and low carbon economy, in its collaboration between the public, private, and civil sectors. Ismaila & Bununu (2019) and Mao, Ma, Wang & Bian (2019) pointed out that low carbon cities arean essential urbanisation mission to establish environmentally-friendly societies that favor a simultaneous development of low carbon economy and environments. The implementation of low carbon cities comprised two vital mechanisms, i.e., absorption and emission.…”

Introduction to the Special Issue: Policy for Low-Carbon Transformations

“…Mao, Ma, Wang, and Bian (2019) [4] examine a case of Qihe County in Shandong, China, focusing on policy instruments adopted for low-carbon city development and the effectiveness of these instruments. The article analyzes multi-policy goals, two policy domains (energy and mobility), various types of instruments (compulsory, mixed and voluntary), and layers (urban and national level).…”

“…EU regulation turns out to be critical for reducing the role of coal. Mao et al (2019) [4] highlight the strong influence of national instruments on urban development in China. Lastly, one of the key reasons for Norway's global lead in E-mobility market share was the alignment of national policies for E-mobility (especially financial purchase support) with particular local user benefits (such as parking and use of the car-pool lane) (Dijk et al 2020) [6].…”