2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating preference heterogeneity in Value of Time (VOT) and Value of Reliability (VOR) estimation for managed lanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such scenarios have been studied extensively in the United States and present travellers with a real time-money trade-off (see e.g. Brownstone and Small, 2005, Hess et al, 2011, Hossan et al, 2016, Lam and Small, 2005. However, they are not commonly used for national studies, which seek to establish a reliable long-term measure of VTT for appraisal rather than a journey specific one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such scenarios have been studied extensively in the United States and present travellers with a real time-money trade-off (see e.g. Brownstone and Small, 2005, Hess et al, 2011, Hossan et al, 2016, Lam and Small, 2005. However, they are not commonly used for national studies, which seek to establish a reliable long-term measure of VTT for appraisal rather than a journey specific one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variance of the Poisson distribution is equal to the mean. The utilized VOT stochastic distribution in the Monte Carlo simulation was calculated based on a distribution derived in a study by Hossan et al ( 28 ). The travel demand is assumed to have a fixed coefficient of variation, calculated based on real-world data in Florida and with the mean demands changing according to a uniformly distributed random annual growth rate between 0.5% and 1.5%.…”
Section: Methodolgymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common data source for managed lane behavior modeling is SP data, as many managed lane studies investigate responses to infrastructures, policies, or both that have not yet been implemented (e.g., 32 , 33 ). SP studies generally have the limitation of hypothetical bias ( 15 , 33 ), which can be alleviated by combining SP with RP data of the existing situation ( 20 , 34 , 35 ). However, in the context of managed lanes, several studies have found that how travelers actually make choices deviates from the presumptions and conclusions of many SP studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%