2019
DOI: 10.1177/0735633119845694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating “Problem-Solving With Datasets” as an Implementation of Computational Thinking: A Literature Review

Abstract: This study aims to investigate problem-solving with dataset (PSWD) as a computational thinking learning implementation as reflected in academic publications. Specifically, the purpose is to specify the scope of PSWD, which overlaps with the data literacy, thinking with data, big data literacy, and data-based thinking concepts in the literature. Subaims of the study are to identify the conceptual structure of PSWD based on definitions in academic publications and to classify the reasons given in the literature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our initial work [71] exploring how 20 European CS studies in nine European countries designed and implemented innovative teaching and learning, we found some preliminary evidence that educators indeed design CS practices by incorporating some of the nine EDU4 elements. On average we found 4.10 (out of nine) EDU4 elements in these 20 studies but with substantial variation (SD = 2.10) and range (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). A preliminary cluster analysis suggested three initial clusters of practices among European CS educators, which we initially labelled as EDU 4.0 light (i.e., incorporating one or two EDU 4.0 characteristics, n = 8), Project-based/ hands-on learning (i.e., using project-based/hands-on approaches, n = 6), and Full EDU 4.0, using a broad range of EDU4 characteristics, n = 6).…”
Section: Education 40mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In our initial work [71] exploring how 20 European CS studies in nine European countries designed and implemented innovative teaching and learning, we found some preliminary evidence that educators indeed design CS practices by incorporating some of the nine EDU4 elements. On average we found 4.10 (out of nine) EDU4 elements in these 20 studies but with substantial variation (SD = 2.10) and range (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). A preliminary cluster analysis suggested three initial clusters of practices among European CS educators, which we initially labelled as EDU 4.0 light (i.e., incorporating one or two EDU 4.0 characteristics, n = 8), Project-based/ hands-on learning (i.e., using project-based/hands-on approaches, n = 6), and Full EDU 4.0, using a broad range of EDU4 characteristics, n = 6).…”
Section: Education 40mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In terms of what critical thinking actually means in the context of CT, some papers define it as a methodological way of evaluating and making decisions in problem-solving (Berikan & Özdemir, 2020; Brennan & Resnick, 2012; Korkmaz et al, 2017; Voskoglou & Buckley, 2012). The latter is, for instance, described in Brennan and Resnick’s (2012) computational perspectives (perceptions about individuals and the world around them), when the authors refer to the ability of questioning the taken-for-granted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supportively, results from the past studies reported that the most frequently suggested method for improving CT ability is using real-world problems (Berikan & Özdemir, 2020). It is helping learners to set their own learning goals through a problem in their real-life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%