Reports of a high frequency of the transmission of minority viral populations with drug-resistant mutations (DRM) are inconsistent with evidence that HIV-1 infections usually arise from mono-or oligoclonal transmission. We performed ultradeep sequencing (UDS) of partial HIV-1 gag, pol, and env genes from 32 recently infected individuals. We then evaluated overall and per-site diversity levels, selective pressure, sequence reproducibility, and presence of DRM and accessory mutations (AM). To differentiate biologically meaningful mutations from those caused by methodological errors, we obtained multinomial confidence intervals (CI) for the proportion of DRM at each site and fitted a binomial mixture model to determine background error rates for each sample. We then examined the association between detected minority DRM and the virologic failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Similar to other studies, we observed increased detection of DRM at low frequencies (average, 0.56%; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.69; expected UDS error, 0.21 Ű 0.08% mutations/site). For 8 duplicate runs, there was variability in the proportions of minority DRM. There was no indication of increased diversity or selection at DRM sites compared to other sites and no association between minority DRM and AM. There was no correlation between detected minority DRM and clinical failure of first-line ART. It is unlikely that minority viral variants harboring DRM are transmitted and maintained in the recipient host. The majority of low-frequency DRM detected using UDS are likely errors inherent to UDS methodology or a consequence of error-prone HIV-1 replication.Using standard population-based genotypic assays of HIV from individuals not yet treated with antiretroviral drugs, several studies (43,64,69,76) have estimated the rate of transmitted drug resistance to be between 8 and 27% in countries with the highest rates of antiretroviral therapy (ART) use. In resource-limited settings, in which the introduction of ART has been more recent, the estimated frequency of transmitted drug resistance mutations (DRM) is substantially lower (41). It appears, however, to be increasing in these settings as well (2,14,51). Using more-sensitive genotypic assays, different research groups (15,30,32,37,48,58,65) have reported higher proportions of transmitted DRM in ART-naive individuals. The clinical importance of these low-level DRM remains unclear, as they have been associated with clinical consequences in some (21,24,32,36,37,40,46,54,55,63,66,71) but not all (30, 47, 58) studies.Highly sensitive assays for detecting low-frequency DRM include point mutation assays and high-resolution sequencing techniques. Point mutation assays, such as allele-specific PCR, can detect DRM at frequencies as low as 0.01% of the sampled viral population (31,45,53,54), but they do not provide information about the sequence context surrounding a given DRM and may be prone to false positives at the lower level of detection (22). High-resolution sequencing techniques, such as single ge...