“…This illuminates the need for addressing the power relations that exist among teachers and students, as well as with respect to students' families and home communities. A variety of tandem theories are represented amid these studies, including third space theories that point to the hybridity of knowledge production processes that are neither exclusively school-nor community-based but recontextualized by students as a result of more inclusive learning opportunities provided via the FoK approach (Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2009;Fitts, 2009;Hammond, 2001;Moje et al, 2004;Smythe & Toohey, 2009); critical literacy theories that combine with FoK approaches to increase the consciousness of teachers (and students) toward multiple forms of literacy and facilitate students' ability to "read the world" (Camangian, 2010;Fisher, 2006;Freire, 1970Freire, /1993Keis, 2006;Pirbhai-Illich, 2010;Rogers et al, 2004;Street, 2005); sociocultural theories that are linked to the potency of FoK approaches to bring situated and socially mediated learning into relief, particularly for preservice or novice teachers and parents of preschool-age children (Dantas, 2007;Monzo & Rueda, 2003;Nathenson-Mejia & Escamilla, 2003;Riojas-Cortez, 2001;Riojas-Cortez & Flores Bustos, 2009;Riojas-Cortez et al, 2008;Wang, Bernas, & Eberhard, 2005); and social justice and community empowerment theories that link FoK practices to broader critical consciousness imperatives involving the reformulation of social arrangements and the fostering of interdependence among community members (Henderson & Zipin, 2010;Kurtyka, 2010;Sugarman, 2010;Upadhyay, 2009;Zipin & Reid, 2008;Zipin et al, 2012).…”