2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating sorption characteristics of copper ions onto insolubilized humic acid by using a continuously monitored solid phase extraction technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher sorption affinity of surface bonded fraction (k L,1 ) than that of ion exchanged fraction (k L,2 ) of Cu 2+ on a given HA fraction could be attributed to the stronger attraction and higher sorption energy occurred in surface complexation process than that in ion exchange process, consistent with previous results (Tipping, 2002;Bradl, 2004;Jiang et al, 2005). The smaller sorption capacity of surface bonded fraction (q m,1 ) than that of ion exchanged fraction (q m,2 ) could be attributed to the less sorption sites available on a given HA fraction for Cu 2+ sorption through surface complexation, compared with the sites available for Cu 2+ sorption through ion exchange (Gezici et al, 2007a(Gezici et al, , 2007b. Sorption capacity of the surface bonded fraction (q m,1 ) and the ion exchanged fraction (q m,2 ) at a given pH decreased with increasing extraction, and were both in an order of HAA > HAB > HAC > HAD (Table 2).…”
Section: Isotherms Of Cu 2+ On Ha Fractionssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher sorption affinity of surface bonded fraction (k L,1 ) than that of ion exchanged fraction (k L,2 ) of Cu 2+ on a given HA fraction could be attributed to the stronger attraction and higher sorption energy occurred in surface complexation process than that in ion exchange process, consistent with previous results (Tipping, 2002;Bradl, 2004;Jiang et al, 2005). The smaller sorption capacity of surface bonded fraction (q m,1 ) than that of ion exchanged fraction (q m,2 ) could be attributed to the less sorption sites available on a given HA fraction for Cu 2+ sorption through surface complexation, compared with the sites available for Cu 2+ sorption through ion exchange (Gezici et al, 2007a(Gezici et al, , 2007b. Sorption capacity of the surface bonded fraction (q m,1 ) and the ion exchanged fraction (q m,2 ) at a given pH decreased with increasing extraction, and were both in an order of HAA > HAB > HAC > HAD (Table 2).…”
Section: Isotherms Of Cu 2+ On Ha Fractionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…S4) and the larger values of q m,1 and q m,2 at pH 4.0 than that at pH 2.0 (Table 2) suggested that the carboxyl groups should be the predominant functional groups of the HA fractions responsible for Cu 2+ sorption through both surface complexation and ion exchange, consistent with previous studies (Biglke et al, 2010;El-Eswed and Khalili, 2006;Rovira et al, 2010). Solution pH could change the heavy metal species and the HA structures (Liu and Gonzalez, 2000;Gezici et al, 2007a;Yang et al, 2011), both of which control the sorption of heavy metal ions on HAs. At pH in the range from 1.5 to 4.5, divalent copper exists predominantly as Cu 2+ species in water (Li et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Role Of Functional Groups Of Ha Fractions In Sorption Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SEM images were taken with ×2000 magnification. The increase in the size of pores is observed on the surface of the particles [6,7]. Heavy elements are sorbed mainly in pores; the change in Stretching vibrations are determined between the ranges of 225 to 4000 cm -1 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Complexesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A number of investigations have been carried out upon the sorption behavior of insolubilized humic acid to cations such as nickel, cesium, barium, copper etc. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%