Investigating Student Perceptions of a Dissection‐Based Undergraduate Gross Anatomy Course Using Q Methodology

Abstract

The demand for upper‐level undergraduate dissection‐based anatomy courses is growing, as professional programs require more advanced anatomy training prior to matriculation. To address this need, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) partnered with Indiana University‐Purdue University Indianapolis—a large, urban, life science‐focused campus nearby to IUSM—to offer an undergraduate, dissection‐based course in regional gross anatomy. Because this is a new course, a deeper post‐course evaluation of student perceptions was conducted using Q methodology. In this study, Q methodology was used to evaluate student views of the overall course structure, pre‐laboratory materials and activities, assessments, and quality of instruction. Of the 15 students in the spring semester 2018 cohort, 80% (n = 12) participated in the evaluation, and 10 of those students followed up with written explanations for their rationale in selecting the four statements with which they most strongly agreed and disagreed. The Q methodology sorted the students into one of three statistically significant groups: Motivated Dissectors (n = 6), Traditional Students (n = 3), and Inspired Learners (n = 3). Motivated Dissectors and Inspired Learners felt strongly that the course did not encourage self‐directed learning and that the pre‐laboratory materials were not adequate to prepare them for quizzes. Traditional Students, however, disagreed, having a favorable opinion of the pre‐laboratory materials, even though this group felt most strongly that the amount of material covered in the course was overwhelming. This study demonstrates the utility of Q methodology to evaluate courses to elucidate student perspectives and inform future course modifications.

“A whole new perspective on how the body fits together”—An evaluation of a cadaver laboratory experience for high school students

“…The majority of visiting students also reported the laboratory tour experience either maintained or increased their existing interest in pursuing a healthcare career. Studies have demonstrated that engaging with cadaver dissection, prosections, and isolated organs can increase students' interest in health professions careers (Zayas & McGuigan, 2006; Achilly, 2017; Byram et al, 2020). Students expressed awe at the first‐hand experience of anatomy and pathology, which could serve as a defining moment that sparks a life‐long fascination with the health sciences.…”

A longitudinal Q-study to assess changes in students’ perceptions at the time of pandemic

“…Q-methodology has been shown to be a useful approach to end-of-term course evaluations for examining students’ perceptions regarding course content and delivery 11 , 12 , 28 . Although literature is scarce in the use of this robust approach for evaluating change over time, our results demonstrate that Q-methodology can also reveal clear granular findings on changes in perceptions over time related to course evaluations.…”

First patient project: Engaging pathology through the donor dissection experience and its role in professionalism

“…This study took place in the context of the Cadaveric Human Anatomy (BIOL N461) course at Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), an advanced‐level undergraduate course for students interested in health professional programs (e.g., physical therapy, physician assistant, medicine, etc.). More details about the overall course structure can be found in Byram and colleagues (2020). The FPP was first implemented in the spring semester of 2020 as the course instructors sought to formalize what was an informal, or even implicit, focus on humanism in the course.…”