2015
DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2015.1020393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating student teachers’ presentations of literacy and literacy pedagogy in a complex context

Abstract: The field of literacy and primary literacy education is patterned by multiple discourses and this raises challenges for those educating the next generation of primary literacy teachers. In England, the last 15 years have seen considerable levels of prescription in the primary literacy curriculum and compliance by the school and teacher education sectors has been enforced through demanding accountability regimes. In this paper, we draw on findings of a small-scale interview study to consider how understandings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, deficit perspectives do not provide the only ways in which educators understand what children do. Teachers’ perspectives are often framed by multiple and seemingly conflicting discourses of childhood, literacy and education and these intersect in complex ways (Alsup, 2006; Burnett et al., 2015). For instance, teachers may be just as likely to celebrate children’s creativity and wellbeing as they are to foreground specific skills (or the lack of them), and certainly focusing on what children can do (rather than what they cannot) has led to empowering approaches to literacy provision (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, deficit perspectives do not provide the only ways in which educators understand what children do. Teachers’ perspectives are often framed by multiple and seemingly conflicting discourses of childhood, literacy and education and these intersect in complex ways (Alsup, 2006; Burnett et al., 2015). For instance, teachers may be just as likely to celebrate children’s creativity and wellbeing as they are to foreground specific skills (or the lack of them), and certainly focusing on what children can do (rather than what they cannot) has led to empowering approaches to literacy provision (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%