Investigating the Adsorption Behavior of Polyaniline and Its Clay Nanocomposite towards Ammonia Gas

Abstract

Air pollution and control of gaseous air pollutants are global concerns. Exposure to these gaseous contaminants causes several health risks, especially exposure to irritant gases such as ammonia (NH3). Furthermore, the application of smart polymeric nanocomposites in environmental applications has gained significant interest in recent years. In this study, aniline was polymerized without and with clay using a carbon dioxide (CO2)-assisted polymerization technique, yielding PANI and PANC samples, respectively. The samples were characterized using different methods, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Brunner Emmett Teller (BET). The synthesized nanomaterials were utilized as gas adsorbents using a fixed bed reactor to investigate their adsorption behavior towards NH3. Three inlet NH3 concentrations were tested (35–150 ppm). The results revealed that the adsorption capacities of PANC nanocomposites were higher than nanostructured PANI for the studied concentrations. The adsorption capacities were 61.34 mgNH3/gm for PANC and 73.63 mgNH3/gm for PANI at the same inlet concentration (35 ppm). The highest NH3 adsorption capacity recorded was 582.4 mg NH3/gm, for PANC. This study showed the impressive adsorption behavior of the prepared PANI and PANC nanomaterials towards NH3 gas. Consequently, nanostructured PANI and PANC can be promising adsorbents that can be utilized to control different gaseous air pollutants.

In Situ PANI–Graphite Nanochain-like Structures and Their Application as Supercapacitive Electrodes

“…Composite materials showed a slight increase in the specific surface area compared to raw synthesized PANI, but lower than other PANI values reported [42,43]. However, it is worth mentioning that other authors like El-Shazly et al indicate that the specific surface area of PANI-clay nanocomposites is lower than PANI due to the blocking of the active sites of the material because of the filler [44]. In our work, we consider that this small increase is due to the change in morphology of PANI nanocomposites.…”