Investigating the Barriers and Facilitators to Achieving Coaching Certification

Abstract

Despite a significant number of coaches pursuing formal coach training through the National Coaching Certification Program in Canada each year, very few complete the entire certification process. The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators that influence Canadian coaches’ decisions to acquire coaching certification. A mixed-methods convergent parallel design was employed to address the research question. The participants included 1,518 certified and noncertified coaches across Canada who completed an online questionnaire identifying the barriers and facilitators to pursuing coaching certification; of this sample, 38 coaches participated in a follow-up telephone interview. Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, the findings suggest that most coaches reside in the precontemplation stage, in which they believe in and are thinking about certification, but have yet to engage in preparation. The barriers to pursuing certification included time, cost, tediousness of the process, and inaccessible evaluators, whereas the facilitators included enhanced knowledge and skills and improved coaching reputation. Future directions for increasing participation rates in the certification process include clearly identifying and broadly disseminating the benefits of acquiring certification, clarifying the criteria for evaluation, streamlining the certification process and incorporating online models, enhancing accessibility of evaluators, and incentivizing and rewarding certification.

NPCs in video games: a reflective resource for sports coaches and participant engagement

“…This approach is designed to be flexibility, addressing significant obstacles identified in current coaching education, such as the lack of time efficiency and flexibility highlighted by Dawson ( 59 ) and Gurgis, Kerr, and Stirling ( 60 ). These barriers often deter early career, part-time, and volunteer coaches from engaging fully in traditional training programs.…”

Reviewing Original Research Articles Published in the International Sport Coaching Journal

“…For quantitative research, the most common design was nonexperimental (14.9%; e.g., Vealey et al, 2020). For mixed methods designs, the most common were convergent (8.9%; e.g., Gurgis et al, 2020) and case study (5.9%; e.g., Mueller et al, 2018).…”

Exploring football coaches’ views on coach education, role, and practice design: An Australian perspective

“…Globally, formal coach accreditation processes are thought to be important for quality assurance, ensuring a baseline of knowledge and competency across a variety of coaching cohorts [11][12][13][14]. As such, numerous countries have developed national coaching curricula [15], aiming to assist coaches "hone in their craft and become effective and ethical at achieving desirable ideals" [4 p.2]. This increase in the provision of formal coach education is due, in part, to the professionalisation of modern-day coaching, where coaches are now tasked with greater responsibilities, both on and off the pitch [16].…”