2020
DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2019.1674307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Classification Accuracy of Rasch and Nominal Weights Mean Equating with Very Small Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group ability θ means were set to .65 (low ability), .90 (medium ability), and 1.1 (high ability) with a standard deviation of .5. Similar person parameters have been utilized in other simulation studies in the medical certification field (Furter & Dwyer, ). Thus, group means differed by .5 and 1.0 standard deviations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group ability θ means were set to .65 (low ability), .90 (medium ability), and 1.1 (high ability) with a standard deviation of .5. Similar person parameters have been utilized in other simulation studies in the medical certification field (Furter & Dwyer, ). Thus, group means differed by .5 and 1.0 standard deviations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim, 2022). Because it is assumed that a parallel test in terms of material (derived from the same grid) is incorrect, a process that equalizes the scores of parallel test sets by eliminating the factor of differences in difficulty levels between these devices is required (Furter & Dwyer, 2020). Equating is a procedure for scoring test takers based on their abilities by removing the effect of test device difficulty differences (W. J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%