2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Eastern Alpine–Dinaric transition with teleseismic receiver functions: Evidence for subducted European crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proxy depth corresponds also to the maximum interface probability as shown in Figure S14 of the Supporting Information . The Moho proxy is similar to previous estimates from receiver functions (Kummerow et al., 2004; Mroczek et al., 2023; Spada et al., 2013). The depth differences between this study and the inferred depths from Spada et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proxy depth corresponds also to the maximum interface probability as shown in Figure S14 of the Supporting Information . The Moho proxy is similar to previous estimates from receiver functions (Kummerow et al., 2004; Mroczek et al., 2023; Spada et al., 2013). The depth differences between this study and the inferred depths from Spada et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10.1029/2023GC011238 proxy depth corresponds also to the maximum interface probability as shown in Figure S14 of the Supporting Information S1. The Moho proxy is similar to previous estimates from receiver functions (Kummerow et al, 2004;Mroczek et al, 2023;Spada et al, 2013). The depth differences between this study and the inferred depths from Spada et al (2013) and those from the receiver-function study of Mroczek et al (2023) are mostly in the range of 0-10 km as can be seen from the profiles in Figure 8.…”
Section: Moho Structuresupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations