2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of a backchannel on university classroom interactions: A mixed-method case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comments regarding shared experiences received positive votes and demonstrated the beginnings of community awareness (Draper and Brown 2004) and indications of social validation (Kang, Dabbish and Sutton 2016). This implies as Baron et al (2016) stated that opening up this 'digital backchannel' has enacted additional engagement. It is possible that students already used Facebook as an alternative method of peer communication as indicated by one student comment, and reserved their questions in the anonymous platform for lecture engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comments regarding shared experiences received positive votes and demonstrated the beginnings of community awareness (Draper and Brown 2004) and indications of social validation (Kang, Dabbish and Sutton 2016). This implies as Baron et al (2016) stated that opening up this 'digital backchannel' has enacted additional engagement. It is possible that students already used Facebook as an alternative method of peer communication as indicated by one student comment, and reserved their questions in the anonymous platform for lecture engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That fact has shown that technology involvement may increase the students' engagement in their learning (Rashid & Asghar, 2016). This engagement may result in raising the students to learn which is considered crucial for the improvement of learning (Baron et al, 2016). The fact also mentions that students are ready for technology use and learning changes since they live in a rapid technology evolution era (Li, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the system, this feedback can take the form of questions or comments on the lecture content, votes or responses to posts from other students, messages referring to the lecture's presentation (e.g. pace of lecturing), or indications of being lost, for example [1], [4], [8], [16]. The benefits of digital backchannels are not so well studied as those of ARSs.…”
Section: Literature Review and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of digital backchannels are not so well studied as those of ARSs. Some studies suggest that backchannels which permit students to post questions anonymously could increase their engagement [1], [5], and the number of questions asked in class [1], [2], [16]. However, students might also misuse these backchannels [2], [4], [8] to publish off-topics or inappropriate posts, thus disrupting the class.…”
Section: Literature Review and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%