2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of caseworker characteristics in child welfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
52
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common variable in this category is caseworker turnover. Caseworker turnover was predictive of slower time to exit and lower rates of reunification Ryan, Garnier, Zyphur, & Zhai, 2006).…”
Section: Agency/caseworker Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common variable in this category is caseworker turnover. Caseworker turnover was predictive of slower time to exit and lower rates of reunification Ryan, Garnier, Zyphur, & Zhai, 2006).…”
Section: Agency/caseworker Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for this denial could well be that being able to leave aside personal differences is almost synonymous with being a good professional, so admitting to this inability would be seen as a cardinal sin by the profession. However, research has shown that personal characteristics can impact judgements and decisions (Gambrill, 2005;Ryan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Reasons Provided For Disagreements Amongst Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En plus d'avoir des retombés négatives sur les clients, en particulier sur les enfants, une augmentation du délai de retour dans la famille pour un enfant placé a été observé (Child Welfare League of America, 2008;Flower et coll., 2005;Fulcher et Smith, 2010). Enfin, au plan de l'intervention, il est reconnu que la durée du placement d'un client est généralement plus grande lorsque celui-ci vit de la discontinuité (Ryan, Garnier, Zyphur et Zhai, 2006) tandis que le temps de réunification familiale est plus long lorsqu'il y a plusieurs changements d'intervenants au cours du suivi (Goerge, 1994).…”
unclassified