2022
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2022.2112061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of ensemble and weight optimization approaches on neural networks’ performance to estimate the dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the developed model can successfully estimate the E* with better performance than the Witczak models. Huang et al [23] hybridized the ensemble and weight optimization approaches with an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm to develop an asphalt concrete E* prediction model. The ρ200, V beff , binder G* (dynamic shear modulus) and binder δ (phase angle) were the variables of the developed model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the developed model can successfully estimate the E* with better performance than the Witczak models. Huang et al [23] hybridized the ensemble and weight optimization approaches with an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm to develop an asphalt concrete E* prediction model. The ρ200, V beff , binder G* (dynamic shear modulus) and binder δ (phase angle) were the variables of the developed model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning models have attracted more and more attention from civil engineers because of their high prediction accuracy and high prediction efficiency [31,32], and have been successfully applied to the prediction of concrete strength [33][34][35][36][37]. Hoang et al [38] proposed using Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to simulate the mechanical properties of high-performance concrete (HPC) and compared the prediction effect of GPR with the prediction models of least squares support vector machines and artificial neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML models can accurately model the objectives of cementitious materials without knowing the explicit relationships between the objectives and the input variables [ 8 ], which is superior to conventionally used linear or nonlinear regression models that rely highly on the coefficients of the models [ 9 , 10 ]. Currently, the widely used ML models for modeling objectives include the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and tree-based models, such as Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosted Regression Tree (GBRT) [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%