2007
DOI: 10.1186/1477-044x-5-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of external fields polarization on the coupling of pure magnetic waves in the human body in very low frequencies

Abstract: In this paper we studied the effects of external fields' polarization on the coupling of pure magnetic fields into human body. Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method is used to calculate the current densities induced in a 1 cm resolution anatomically based model with proper tissue conductivities. Twenty different tissues have been considered in this investigation and scaled FDTD technique is used to convert the results of computer code run in 15 MHz to low frequencies which are encountered in the vicinity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include use of electrostatic finite element modeling to predict the volume of activated tissue in electrical brain stimulation ( McIntyre and Grill, 2001 ; Butson and McIntyre, 2006 ; Golestanirad et al, 2012b ), eddy current modeling to assess the distribution of cortical currents in magnetic brain stimulation ( Wagner T. et al, 2004 ; Wagner T.A. et al, 2004 ; Golestanirad et al, 2010 , 2012c ), and analysis of body exposure to low frequency magnetic fields and safety hazards due to motion of medical implants in magnetic fields ( Condon and Hadley, 2000 ; Golestani-Rad et al, 2007 ; Golestanirad et al, 2012a ). Recently, the role of numerical modeling has also been emphasized in safety assessment of MRI in patients with conductive implants ( Clare McElcheran and Graham, 2014 ; Golestanirad et al, 2017a , b ; McElcheran et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include use of electrostatic finite element modeling to predict the volume of activated tissue in electrical brain stimulation ( McIntyre and Grill, 2001 ; Butson and McIntyre, 2006 ; Golestanirad et al, 2012b ), eddy current modeling to assess the distribution of cortical currents in magnetic brain stimulation ( Wagner T. et al, 2004 ; Wagner T.A. et al, 2004 ; Golestanirad et al, 2010 , 2012c ), and analysis of body exposure to low frequency magnetic fields and safety hazards due to motion of medical implants in magnetic fields ( Condon and Hadley, 2000 ; Golestani-Rad et al, 2007 ; Golestanirad et al, 2012a ). Recently, the role of numerical modeling has also been emphasized in safety assessment of MRI in patients with conductive implants ( Clare McElcheran and Graham, 2014 ; Golestanirad et al, 2017a , b ; McElcheran et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-wave methods have been extensively used to address the interaction of electromagnetic waves and living tissues (Golestani-Rad et al, 2007; Golestanirad et al, 2010, 2012a,b). To investigate the performance of the proposed modified fractal electrodes, three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of fractal electrodes were developed inside a 3D homogenous conducting medium (Figure 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of RF heating phenomenon and its large parameter space has been emphasized in experimental studies [43,47]. The application of electromagnetic simulations to better understand the phenomenology of electric and magnetic field interaction with the tissue has proven to be indispensable [32,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. One exquisite advantage of computational models is that they allow for a controlled and systematic change of design parameters and enable the assessment of multitude of design scenarios in a reasonable time.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%