2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9717-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of peer instruction on preservice mathematics teachers’ achievements in statistics and probability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though peer instruction is now one of the most surveyed teaching strategies connected to electronic voting and there have been many studies on its implementation in STEM disciplines (Mazur & Crouch, 2001;Vickrey et al, 2015;Michinov et al, 2015;Balta et al, 2017), few examples have been realised in elementary (Chen et al, 2005) or high school education or in mathematics education (Pilzer, 2001;Lucas, 2009;Olpak et al, 2018).…”
Section: Peer Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though peer instruction is now one of the most surveyed teaching strategies connected to electronic voting and there have been many studies on its implementation in STEM disciplines (Mazur & Crouch, 2001;Vickrey et al, 2015;Michinov et al, 2015;Balta et al, 2017), few examples have been realised in elementary (Chen et al, 2005) or high school education or in mathematics education (Pilzer, 2001;Lucas, 2009;Olpak et al, 2018).…”
Section: Peer Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to see longitudinal changes in pupils' attitudes towards mathematics, questionnaire Q3 was assigned periodically after each topic was taught {5}. To determine pupils' attitudes towards peer instruction itself, questionnaire Q4 was used from the study of Olpak et al (2018) at the end of the 2018/2019 school year {4}. (Discussions of design, usage and results of Q1, Q2, Q3, T1 and T2 can be found later in the article.…”
Section: Research Timeline and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, examining attitudes and beliefs is crucial (Levin & Wadmany, 2008). Technology has a great deal of advantages such as developing students' critical and high-order thinking, motivation, interest, curiosity, and collaboration (Hew & Brush, 2007), and providing a learning environment in which teachers use and apply 21 st century skills (Lambert & Gong, 2010;Olpak, Baltacı, & Arıcan, 2018). However, researches (Becker, 2000;Hew & Brush, 2007;Wang, Ertmer, & Newby, 2004) address underuse of technology.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca, veri analizi uygulamalarının altında yatan ilke ve kavramlar hakkında doğru bilgiyi edinmeleri adına çok az imkân verilen öğretmenlerin öğrencilerinin istatistiksel bilgiyi oluşturmakta zorlandıkları gözlenmiştir (Franklin ve diğerleri, 2007). Genel olarak bakıldığında istatistik ve olasılık ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların (örn., Olpak, Baltaci & Arican, 2018;Tsakiridou & Vavyla, 2015;Zhang & Maas, 2019) Klasik Test Kurmalarını (KTK) kullanarak toplam skora dayalı bir değerlendirme sistemi içerdiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmalarda öğrencilerin aldıkları toplam puanların ortalaması alınarak öğrenci performansları hakkında değerlendirme yapılmaktadır.…”
unclassified