2014
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2014.980021
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Efficacy of a Core Kindergarten Mathematics Curriculum to Improve Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each cycle focuses on a particular problem introduced with the help of concrete objects. The pedagogy is inspired by the concrete-representational-abstract (CRA) model (Witzel et al, 2003) used in the intervention presented by Clarke et al (2011) and Clarke et al (2015). Our design modifies it into a more investigative approach (Baroody, Cibulskis, Lai, & Li, 2004) that we will describe in the methods section.…”
Section: A Systematic and Explicit Instruction For Each Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cycle focuses on a particular problem introduced with the help of concrete objects. The pedagogy is inspired by the concrete-representational-abstract (CRA) model (Witzel et al, 2003) used in the intervention presented by Clarke et al (2011) and Clarke et al (2015). Our design modifies it into a more investigative approach (Baroody, Cibulskis, Lai, & Li, 2004) that we will describe in the methods section.…”
Section: A Systematic and Explicit Instruction For Each Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyson, Jordan, Beliakoff, and Hassinger-Das (2015) demonstrated that a supplemental Kindergarten number sense intervention delivered to small groups of students had substantially positive impacts on children's number sense, arithmetic fluency, and mathematics calculation achievement (effect sizes = 0.32 to 0.82). In contrast, Clarke et al (2015) reported negligible effects (p-values = .0517 to .89) of a core Kindergarten mathematics curriculum on four mathematics outcomes (effect sizes = -0.008 to .108). The effect sizes in the present study are therefore significant because supplemental use of the Building Blocks software, as implemented in the present study, does not involve a large amount of teachers' time, does not interrupt children's regular mathematics classroom instruction, and does not interfere with other academic programming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…More recently, Clarke et al (2015) conducted a largescale, randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the Early Learning in Mathematics (ELM) program in 129 kindergarten classrooms. Whereas classrooms randomly assigned to the treatment condition used the ELM program, a 120-lesson core mathematics program that centers on an explicit instructional framework, control classrooms continued to provide "business-as-usual" (BAU) mathematics instruction.…”
Section: Studies Of Explicit Mathematics Instruction In Tier 1 Kindermentioning
confidence: 99%