2013
DOI: 10.1080/21622515.2013.865086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the efficiency of constructed wetlands in the removal of heavy metals and enteric pathogens from wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows removal of pathogens by each treatment wetland and Phase. The VSSF TWs provide some disinfection, and the objective of this section is showing the contribution regarding pathogen indicators performance of each of treatment lines [ 23 , 50 ]. VF-N had more than 50% of data as compared to VF-M when total coliforms and E. coli were analyzed at below 1 × 10 3 (1000) MPN/100 mL for each phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 shows removal of pathogens by each treatment wetland and Phase. The VSSF TWs provide some disinfection, and the objective of this section is showing the contribution regarding pathogen indicators performance of each of treatment lines [ 23 , 50 ]. VF-N had more than 50% of data as compared to VF-M when total coliforms and E. coli were analyzed at below 1 × 10 3 (1000) MPN/100 mL for each phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VSSF TWs contribute to disinfection, with removals of between one and three log-units of fecal coliforms or Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) [ 11 , 22 ]. In TWs filtration, entrapment, and sedimentation are cited as important processes in the removal of relatively large amounts of pathogens [ 23 ]. Furthermore, Headly et al [ 22 ] indicate that the combination of sand media, loading, and vegetation requires less depth to achieve a given effluent E. coli concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, rooted plant species have found a wider application. Rooted hydrophytes (e.g., Phragmites spp., Thypha spp., Cyperus alternifolius , and others) and flood-tolerant species (e.g., Chrysopogon zizanioides ) have been employed with excellent results for the construction of surface- and subsurface-flow wetlands (reviewed by [60,61]), as well as floating bed systems [62,63]. In constructed wetlands, the composition of growth beds plays a pivotal role.…”
Section: Phytoremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works of Otter et al [51], Zurita et al [58], and Adrados et al [59] have reported that VSSF TWs provide removals ranging from one and four log units of pathogens (FC), which is similar to those achieved in the present study. Pathogen removal in VSSF TWs can be explained by removal mechanisms, including natural die-off because of starvation, predation, sedimentation, filtration, entrapment, and adsorption, but filtration would be the main pathway [60]. The similarity in pathogen removal in both climate conditions in the VSSF TWs suggests filtration as the main removal mechanism because all VSSF TWs had the same total bed depth (1.0 m), and no effect of climate condition was found.…”
Section: Effluent Concentrations and Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 97%