2010
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2010.2067452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Gaussian Convergence of the Distribution of the Aggregate Interference Power in Large Wireless Networks

Abstract: Abstract-The distribution of the aggregate interference power in large wireless networks has gained increasing attention with the emergence of different types of wireless networks such as ad hoc networks, sensor networks, and cognitive radio networks. The interference in such networks is often characterized using the Poisson point process (PPP). As the number of interfering nodes increases, there might be a tendency to approximate the distribution of the aggregate interference power by a Gaussian random variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing stochastic geometry based work either uses the interference Laplace transform to evaluate simple transmission schemes [7], [8], or models the interference using moment matching gamma distribution [9], [10]. Gaussian distribution is another approximation that is considered for the centered and normalized aggregate wireless interference power [11], [12]. The central limit theorem which justifies the Gaussian approximation, however, does not apply when some of the interferers are dominant.…”
Section: A Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing stochastic geometry based work either uses the interference Laplace transform to evaluate simple transmission schemes [7], [8], or models the interference using moment matching gamma distribution [9], [10]. Gaussian distribution is another approximation that is considered for the centered and normalized aggregate wireless interference power [11], [12]. The central limit theorem which justifies the Gaussian approximation, however, does not apply when some of the interferers are dominant.…”
Section: A Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the Gaussian distribution does not model the interference very well at low density of interferers or when the exclusion region, the region with no interferers, is relatively small, as the cell sizes shrink. The distribution of the interference power at relatively small exclusion regions has a heavy tail which can not be captured by the Gaussian distribution [12]. Here we propose analytical distribution models characterized by only a few parameters, which can be fitted to simple polynomial functions of channel path loss exponent and shadowing variance, and test their fitness against network simulation based on stochastic geometry.…”
Section: A Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing this to (16), one observes that the latter includes the relevant constant and thus can be used to estimate P out , unlike the former. Unfortunately, the (1+o(1)) term appears in the exponent and thus creates a significant uncertainty 8 (see also below). The following Corollary eliminates this uncertainty via an upper bound, leaving vanishing multiplicative uncertainty only.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMSE spatial filter) has been studied in [7]. While in some special cases the aggregate interference distribution of a large wireless network approaches the Gaussian one [8], it is far from being accurate in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMSE spatial filter) has also been studied [6]. While in some special cases the aggregate interference distribution of a large wireless network approaches the Gaussian one [7], it is far from being accurate in general.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%