Investigating the Impact of Standards-Based Interoperability for Design to Manufacturing and Quality in the Supply Chain

Fischer, Kevin; Rosche, Phil; Trainer, Asa; Feeney, Allison Barnard; Hedberg, Thomas D.

doi:10.6028/nist.gcr.15-1009

Cited by 17 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hedberg Jr et al [4] says, “PMI has the potential to make many lifecycle processes run faster, with fewer errors, and at lower cost.” That’s because STEP AP242 offers standards-based models that include the representation of PMI that is computer interpretable [5]. This is a major breakthrough that supports manufacturings need for model-based computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and coordinate-measurement system (CMS) processes because STEP AP242 increases the effectiveness of MBE by enabling a common path for MBD and model-based manufacturing (MBM) integration [32, 12]. For the concept proposed in this paper, STEP AP242 comes from design and represents the edict for the product definition.…”

Section: Background and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Embedding X.509 Digital Certificates in Three-Dimensional Models for Authentication, Authorization, and Traceability of Product Data

Hedberg

Krima²,

Camelio

2016

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exchange and reuse of three-dimensional (3D)-product models are hampered by the absence of trust in product-lifecycle-data quality. The root cause of the missing trust is years of “silo” functions (e.g., engineering, manufacturing, quality assurance) using independent and disconnected processes. Those disconnected processes result in data exchanges that do not contain all of the required information for each downstream lifecycle process, which inhibits the reuse of product data and results in duplicate data. The X.509 standard, maintained by the Telecommunication Standardization Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T), was first issued in 1988. Although originally intended as the authentication framework for the X.500 series for electronic directory services, the X.509 framework is used in a wide range of implementations outside the originally intended paradigm. These implementations range from encrypting websites to software-code signing, yet X.509 certificate use has not widely penetrated engineering and product realms. Our approach is not trying to provide security mechanisms, but equally as important, our method aims to provide insight into what is happening with product data to support trusting the data. This paper provides a review of the use of X.509 certificates and proposes a solution for embedding X.509 digital certificates in 3D models for authentication, authorization, and traceability of product data. This paper also describes an application within the Aerospace domain. Finally, the paper draws conclusions and provides recommendations for further research into using X.509 certificates in product lifecycle management (PLM) workflows to enable a product lifecycle of trust.

show abstract

Section: Background and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Embedding X.509 Digital Certificates in Three-Dimensional Models for Authentication, Authorization, and Traceability of Product Data

Hedberg

Krima²,

Camelio

2016

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies [37, 38, 70] show communicating product data using model-based methods is feasible, but barriers in standards and interoperability remain. For MBE and our concept to be successful, closing the interoperability gaps is paramount.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a Lifecycle Information Framework and Technology in Manufacturing

Hedberg

Feeney

Helu

et al. 2017

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry has been chasing the dream of integrating and linking data across the product lifecycle and enterprises for decades. However, industry has been challenged by the fact that the context in which data is used varies based on the function / role in the product lifecycle that is interacting with the data. Holistically, the data across the product lifecycle must be considered an unstructured data-set because multiple data repositories and domain-specific schema exist in each phase of the lifecycle. This paper explores a concept called the Lifecycle Information Framework and Technology (LIFT). LIFT is a conceptual framework for lifecycle information management and the integration of emerging and existing technologies, which together form the basis of a research agenda for dynamic information modeling in support of digital-data curation and reuse in manufacturing. This paper provides a discussion of the existing technologies and activities that the LIFT concept leverages. Also, the paper describes the motivation for applying such work to the domain of manufacturing. Then, the LIFT concept is discussed in detail, while underlying technologies are further examined and a use case is detailed. Lastly, potential impacts are explored.

show abstract

“…ASME 14.41, for example, lacks to describe which data set document or template to follow [1]. Another uncertainty lies in the lack of recommended practices for a consistent interpretation of the developed standards and their implementation [9,11]. There is also an uncertainty in the semantic product and manufacturing information (PMI) incorporation capabilities of the software and the consumption capabilities of the machines i.e., computer numerical control machines (CNCs), coordinate measuring machines (CMMs), and intelligent tooling.…”

Section: Technological Readinessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Uncertainties in Adoption of Model-Based Definition and Enterprise for High-Value Manufacturing

Goher

Shehab

Al-Ashaab

et al. 2021

Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The world is adopting digital technologies at a rapid pace which are the key enablers to improve every walk of life in the modern era. This quest for digitization has equal rigor within the manufacturing industry. 2D drawings have been used historically to define the specifications of a product for manufacturing. The evolution in digital technologies has made it possible to improve the way of representing these specifications in the form of 3D models which is known as Model-Based Definition (MBD). However, the 2D representation is still the authoritative source within the industry for engineering definition and related documents in the product lifecycle. Though MBD has been adopted in design, discrete part manufacturing, and inspection stages to some extent, the industry heavily relies on the conventional 2D representation of product definition. The digitization process of product definition lies within the adoption of MBD as the authoritative source for all the enterprise activities which is referred to as Model- based Enterprise (MBE). However, there are several uncertainties and risks in this process. In this work, it is ascertained to formulate the key uncertainties in the transformation towards MBD/E. These uncertainties are categorized and analyzed further for visualization.

show abstract

Investigating the Impact of Standards-Based Interoperability for Design to Manufacturing and Quality in the Supply Chain

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Embedding X.509 Digital Certificates in Three-Dimensional Models for Authentication, Authorization, and Traceability of Product Data

Embedding X.509 Digital Certificates in Three-Dimensional Models for Authentication, Authorization, and Traceability of Product Data

Toward a Lifecycle Information Framework and Technology in Manufacturing

Uncertainties in Adoption of Model-Based Definition and Enterprise for High-Value Manufacturing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About