2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the impacts of technological position and European environmental regulation on green automotive patent activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, high ER levels force firms to introduce clean production technology and allocate more capital in green R&D (Pan et al, 2019); furthermore, firms' green TI will enhance EE of both themselves and other firms via knowledge spillover effects, resulting in the decline of energy consumption of the entire areas. Thus, TI inspired by stronger ER is more favorable to enhancing GTFEE (Barbieri, 2015).…”
Section: Test Of Impact Channelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First of all, high ER levels force firms to introduce clean production technology and allocate more capital in green R&D (Pan et al, 2019); furthermore, firms' green TI will enhance EE of both themselves and other firms via knowledge spillover effects, resulting in the decline of energy consumption of the entire areas. Thus, TI inspired by stronger ER is more favorable to enhancing GTFEE (Barbieri, 2015).…”
Section: Test Of Impact Channelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moving on to the microperspective, Popp () finds a positive effect of the tradable permit scheme for Sulphur Dioxide on EI in a sample of 186 U.S. plants over the years 1972–1997. Moreover, focusing on the automotive sector, Barbieri () provides evidence into the inducement effect of different EU environmental policies, such as post‐tax fuel prices, environmental vehicle taxes, CO2 standards and EU emission standards, on green patenting activities of assignees. In addition, Mazzanti and Zoboli () analyse the innovation inducement mechanism of the EU End‐of‐Life Vehicles (ELVs) Directive and show that the effects of economic instruments ‘ in systemic and dynamic settings critically depend on where, along the ‘production chain’, and how, in terms of net cost allocation, the incentive is introduced ’ (Mazzanti & Zoboli, , p. 334).…”
Section: Policy Inducement Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no studies have observed the technology distribution of UIC patents from the perspective of examiners. In addition, relevant research on technology distribution has mainly been conducted from the perspective of applicants (Barbieri, 2015;Gwak and Sohn, 2017;Zhang and Zhang, 2014). We proposed that examiners' citations of technology distribution according to their professional knowledge remains worthy of analysis because it can further define key technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhang and Zhang (2014) used the number of applicants to observe the lifecycles of specific technologies. Barbieri (2015) used applicants' technological proximity to examine the development of technological knowledge. Gwak and Sohn (2017) observed the technology distribution and knowledge flow of woundhealing technology from the perspective of applicants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%