Investigating the influence of institutions, politics, organizations, and governance on the COVID-19 response in British Columbia, Canada: a jurisdictional case study protocol

Abstract

Background Research on public health responses to COVID-19 globally has largely focused on understanding the virus’ epidemiology, identifying interventions to curb transmission, and assessing the impact of interventions on outcomes. Only recently have studies begun to situate their findings within the institutional, political, or organizational contexts of jurisdictions. Within British Columbia (BC), Canada, the COVID-19 response in early 2020 was deemed highly coordinated and effective overall; however, little is understood as to how these upstream factors influenced policy decisions. Methods Using a conceptual framework we developed, we are conducting a multidisciplinary jurisdictional case study to explore the influence of institutional (I), political (P), organizational (O), and governance (G) factors on BC’s COVID-19 public health response in 2020–2021. A document review (e.g. policy documents, media reports) is being used to (1) characterize relevant institutional and political factors in BC, (2) identify key policy decisions in BC’s epidemic progression, (3) create an organizational map of BC’s public health system structure, and (4) identify key informants for interviews. Quantitative data (e.g. COVID-19 case, hospitalization, death counts) from publicly accessible sources will be used to construct BC’s epidemic curve. Key informant interviews (n = 15–20) will explore governance processes in the COVID-19 response and triangulate data from prior procedures. Qualitative data will be analysed using a hybrid deductive–inductive coding approach and framework analysis. By integrating all of the data streams, our aim is to explore decision-making processes, identify how IPOG factors influenced policy decisions, and underscore implications for decision-making in public health crises in the BC context and elsewhere. Knowledge users within the jurisdiction will be consulted to construct recommendations for future planning and preparedness. Discussion As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, governments have initiated retrospective examinations of their policies to identify lessons learned. Our conceptual framework articulates how interrelations between IPOG contextual factors might be applied to such analysis. Through this jurisdictional case study, we aim to contribute findings to strengthen governmental responses and improve preparedness for future health crises. This protocol can be adapted to and applied in other jurisdictions, across subnational jurisdictions, and internationally.

Influences of healthcare workers' behaviours towards infection prevention and control practices in the clinical setting: A systematic review

“…Institutional and organisational jurisdictions influence policy development and governance, and these have an impact on HCWs' work (Brubacher et al., 2022). In the COVID‐19 space, institutions have had the primary role in the supply of transmission‐based PPEs and in addressing critical unreasonable workload issues which arose from acute shortage of manpower.…”

“…It is also known that the nature of clinical environments determines disease dynamics, directly impacting infection risks and crosstransmission(Pinter-Wollman et al, 2018). For this reason, social distancing between patients and HCWs was not always achievable as clinical work is embedded in teams where clinical and adminis-Institutional and organisational jurisdictions influence policy development and governance, and these have an impact on HCWs' work(Brubacher et al, 2022). In the COVID-19 space, institutions have had the primary role in the supply of transmission-based PPEs and in addressing critical unreasonable workload issues which arose from acute shortage of manpower.…”

Centralization and integration of public health systems: Perspectives of public health leaders on factors facilitating and impeding COVID-19 responses in three Canadian provinces

“…Though, arguably navigating these political environments and influencing policy decisions that are considered to be in the best interest of protecting and promoting the public's health is a responsibility of senior public health leaders such as CMOHs [64] . Future research into political factors that necessarily impact pandemic responses, such as “the contested roles” of senior public health leaders and their ability to speak independently may help reveal whether organizational and governance structures could be adapted to better support senior public health leaders to effectively assume their roles [ 64 , 65 ].…”

Understanding COVID: Collaborative Government Campaign for Citizen Digital Health Literacy in the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Currently, a large number of national and subnational governments are conducting retrospective evaluations of COVID-19 health policy decisions and actions to reflect on their strengths and weaknesses and, thus, to find opportunities to reinforce public institutions for future crises [ 13 ]. Thereby, the main aim of this article was to describe the design of the “Understanding COVID” strategy of the Ministry of Health of the Principality of Asturias (Spain), which helped to offer and to adapt information on protection measures against COVID-19 for the entire population of Asturias, including how specific criteria were incorporated for the design of interventions in rural areas with the active participation of their inhabitants.…”