2010
DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2010.11889987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Invariance of Person Parameter Estimates Based on Classical Test and Item Response Theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were found to be consistent with other finding of Marie (2004). The foregoing results resemble that of previous studies (Adedoyin, Nenty, & Chilisa, 2008;Nukhet, 2002;Fan, 1998). However, the difference lies in the choice of a two-parameter or three-parameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were found to be consistent with other finding of Marie (2004). The foregoing results resemble that of previous studies (Adedoyin, Nenty, & Chilisa, 2008;Nukhet, 2002;Fan, 1998). However, the difference lies in the choice of a two-parameter or three-parameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some studies linking CTT and IRT item characteristics have shown signs of positive indications of a relationship that exist between them (Adedoyin, Nenty & Chilisa, 2008;Nukhet, 2002;Fan, 1998). Royce (2009) discovered that 2-parameter IRT model closely resembles CTT of the verbal and non-verbal test in terms of item characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this premise, many researchers have empirically assessed the comparability of IRT and CTT item parameters using different data sets. Some of them include: Fan (1998); Adedoyin, Nenty and Chilisa (2008); Nukhet (2002); Courville (2005) ;MacDonald and Paunonen (2002) and Metibemu (2016). They found that both CTT and IRT statistics were very comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Finally, while in CTT ability levels for items and person tend to change depending on format of the test and sample, in IRT ability levels for both items and person will be invariant across different test formats and different samples (Abedalaziz & Leng, 2013;Adedoyin, Nenty, & Chilisa, 2008).…”
Section: The New Ecological Paradigm (Nep-r)mentioning
confidence: 99%