2009
DOI: 10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Molecular Effects of Superovulation and Embryo Culture on Genomic Imprinting in a Mouse Model System.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.23.457392 doi: bioRxiv preprint acquisition and maintenance of methylation marks on imprinted genes and fetal growth retardation all are associated with SOV protocols in cows and/or mice (Blondin et al, 1996;Van der Auwera, 2001;Fortier et al, 2008;Market-Velker et al, 2010). Differences in embryo development likely result from a lack of accumulation of other maternal components in the final period of follicle growth to the periovulatory stage, not related to the calcium signaling toolkit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.23.457392 doi: bioRxiv preprint acquisition and maintenance of methylation marks on imprinted genes and fetal growth retardation all are associated with SOV protocols in cows and/or mice (Blondin et al, 1996;Van der Auwera, 2001;Fortier et al, 2008;Market-Velker et al, 2010). Differences in embryo development likely result from a lack of accumulation of other maternal components in the final period of follicle growth to the periovulatory stage, not related to the calcium signaling toolkit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence in mice, cows, sheep and humans that superovulation has a detrimental impact on the quality of the resulting ovulated eggs or embryos (Moor et al, 1985;Hyttel et al, 1986;Yun et al, 1989;Assey et al, 1994;Blondin et al, 1996;Van der Auwera, 2001;Baart et al, 2007;Fortier et al, 2008;Market-Velker et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2017). These findings could be explained by many factors, including accelerated oocyte growth, rescue of abnormal oocytes from atresia, and recruitment for ovulation of non-mature oocytes, all of which could lead to eggs that lack the maternally derived stores needed for developmental competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Royster et al revealed that placenta accreta and placenta previa were more common in patients with E2 level > 3000 pg/mL on the day of the trigger (6). In addition, superovulation can alter the phenotype and fetal development by affecting the epigenetics of the oocyte by imprinted DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications (7,8). Exclusion criteria were as follows: controlled ovarian stimulation using mild or natural cycle protocols, freeze-thaw cycles, patients with multiple embryo transfers, multiple pregnancies, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, oocyte and embryo recipients, patients with moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimula-tion syndrome (OHSS), oocyte retrieval of more than 15 and a history of chronic disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%