2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40201-019-00394-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the photo-Fenton process for treating soil washing wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe +2 worked as a scavenger by reacting with OH radicals [30]. Fe+2 concentrations should be kept low for both financial and ecological considerations [31]. These observations conform to the results of [12].…”
Section: Effect Of Initial H2o2 Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Fe +2 worked as a scavenger by reacting with OH radicals [30]. Fe+2 concentrations should be kept low for both financial and ecological considerations [31]. These observations conform to the results of [12].…”
Section: Effect Of Initial H2o2 Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In a survey conducted by Safa and Mehrasbi, the observations showed that, the TOC removal percentage was lower than the COD removal percentage. 39 And in another study conducted by Aljuboury et al, COD and TOC removal percentages were found to be 64 and 78%, respectively. 11 In 2021, research was conducted by Mohadesi and colleagues, and under optimal conditions, COD removal was reported as 77.08%.…”
Section: The Effect Of Reaction Time On Cod and Toc Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The highest percentage of COD removal was observed at a pH of 3. 39 The results indicate that COD and TOC removal efficiency decrease with increasing pH. This is because hydroxyl radicals are formed in larger quantities in an acidic environment.…”
Section: The Effect Of Ph On Cod and Toc Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite the large number of studies using photo-Fenton or electro-Fenton oxidation to treat organics in aqueous solution or spiked soils, no study has reported their direct application in real contaminated soils. Both of these techniques were employed to treat the organic pollutants in soil extract in integration with soil washing of real contaminated soils (Huguenot et al, 2015;Safa and Mehrasbi, 2019;Villa et al, 2010). The readers are directed to Section 4.3 for further readings of this coupling.…”
Section: Photo-fenton and Electro-fenton Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of oxidant after a preliminary reduction step could lead to the mineralization of the reduction by-products as the reactive oxidant species would react faster with low-chlorinated compounds or biphenyl, than with high-chlorinated compounds having greater stability (Rybnikova et al, 2016). oxidation has been successfully used as a post-treatment to decontaminate these contaminated effluents (Huguenot et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2016;Safa and Mehrasbi, 2019;Seo et al, 2015;Villa et al, 2010). For washing in historically contaminated soils, different extracting agents have been used like non-ionic surfactants (Dominguez et al, 2019;Huguenot et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2016;Seo et al, 2015;Villa et al, 2010), biosurfactant (Fanaei et al, 2020), cyclodextrins (Ma et al, 2016), and organic solvents (Usman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Coupling Of Fenton Oxidation With Chemical Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%