2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1304-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the prevalence of non-fluoride toothpaste use in adults and children using nationally representative data from New Zealand: a cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A somewhat surprising finding was that, although almost 80% of high‐SES adults used fluoride toothpaste, this was still 11% per cent lower than for low‐SES adults. This mirrors similar findings from the 2017/18 New Zealand Oral Health Survey, an interview survey of a national sample which found a lower prevalence of non‐fluoride toothpaste use in those of low SES 25 . This difference is difficult to explain, since it would be expected that those of high SES—who have better oral hygiene 26,27,28 —would use fluoride toothpaste.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A somewhat surprising finding was that, although almost 80% of high‐SES adults used fluoride toothpaste, this was still 11% per cent lower than for low‐SES adults. This mirrors similar findings from the 2017/18 New Zealand Oral Health Survey, an interview survey of a national sample which found a lower prevalence of non‐fluoride toothpaste use in those of low SES 25 . This difference is difficult to explain, since it would be expected that those of high SES—who have better oral hygiene 26,27,28 —would use fluoride toothpaste.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This mirrors similar findings from the 2017/18 New Zealand Oral Health Survey, an interview survey of a national sample which found a lower prevalence of non-fluoride toothpaste use in those of low SES. 25 This difference is difficult to explain, since it would be expected that those of high SES-who have better oral hygiene 26,27,28 was shown in a Turkish study to be associated with greater knowledge of fluoride and its protective properties; that same study concluded that fluoride-free toothpaste was preferred by people who lacked information on fluoride. 26 Our finding may be due to higher-SES participants having had both greater autonomy and more access to alternative points of view on a range of health issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, we observed that the use of fluoride toothpaste was carried out only “sometimes” (29.5% before lockdown, 29.5% during lockdown; p > 0.05), or was not used at all (15.5% before lockdown, 16.8% during lockdown; p > 0.05) by a high percentage of subjects. The percentage of children using non-fluoridated toothpaste was higher than that observed (6.4%) in a cross-sectional study conducted in New Zealand on 4723 children [ 45 ]. It is possible to highlight that almost half of the children in the study did not perform the correct topical fluor prophylaxis using fluoride toothpaste even before the lockdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…At baseline, these attitudes showed very high, positive scores reflecting a general, underlying, shared understanding of the importance of these areas with respect to oral health. With regards to the importance of fluoride, despite the strong evidence base and widespread advocacy for its caries-preventive effects [ 22 , 23 ], there is an established, and in some geographies, growing resistance to utilise fluoride containing products, including in communities of lower socioeconomic status who may present a higher disease burden [ 21 , 24 ]. It is, therefore, encouraging to observe the improvement in attitudes achieved in this study, given the public health importance of regular usage of fluoride-containing toothpastes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%