Investigating the Role of Electronic Planning within Planning Reform

Abstract

The limited research on e-Planning in Australia, a perceived slow take up of e-Planning in the New South Wales (NSW) planning system, and the release of a set of e-Planning recommendations as part of a larger planning reform package in November 2007 are the three main reasons for conducting this research. The goal of this paper is to discover the attitudes of planners in the NSW planning system toward Information Technology, and secondly, what the planners understanding of the e-Planning recommendations are. An online survey of 171 planning staff working in NSW local government was conducted during August and September 2008. The survey results confirmed that planners in the NSW planning system are using a wide variety of IT applications, and that although there are frustrations, their attitude is supportive of using IT in their workplace. Participants also demonstrated a strong understanding of the e-Planning recommendations with insightful additional comments collected about the advantages of e-Planning tools and the wider implications for the planning system. Overall, this research has investigated the attitude of planners and found them to be supportive and understanding of the new technologies that are largely yet to be implemented in their workplaces.

Towards satisfying practitioners in using Planning Support Systems

“…Although PSS have been available for more than two decades, their adoption by planners is rather low. Indeed, it has been shown that instrumental, human, organisational and institutional factors, such as low instrument quality, low awareness by planners and low diffusion to and within planning organisations, hamper the adoption of PSS [Russo et al 2017;Brömmelstroet 2013;Williamson & McFarland 2012;Vonk & Geertman 2008;Klosterman & Pettit 2005]. Geertman [2017] recently analysed PSS from four perspectives, namely PSS history, PSS research, PSS education and PSS in practice, and encouraged to differentiate research on PSS in order to improve the body of knowledge and possibly PSS adoption in practice.…”

How to Include Omnichannel Services in Land-Use Policy?

“…In the broader sense e-planning is a socio-cultural, ethical and political practice, in which people take part in the subsequent phases of the planning process, both directly (offline) and remotely (online) (Horelli & Wallin, 2010). Since it is obvious that planners' are supportive of using ICT in their workplace and that they recognise the benefits of electronic communications, simultaneously they prefer the face-to-face contact to communicate complex issues (Williamson & McFarland, 2012). This broad view captures all the contemporary forms of decision-making processes, however it does not explain in what sense e-planning is different from traditional planning.…”

Smart City, Integrated Planning, and Multilevel Governance

“…In the broader sense EP is a socio-cultural, ethical and political practice, in which people take part in the subsequent phases of the planning process, both directly (offline) and remotely (online) (Horelli & Wallin, 2010). Since it is obvious that planners are supportive of using ICT in their workplace and that they recognise the benefits of electronic communications, simultaneously they prefer the face-to-face contact to communicate complex issues (Williamson & McFarland, 2012). This broad view captures all the contemporary forms of decision-making processes, however it does not explain in what EP is different from traditional planning.…”