2012
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201103470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Role of Grain Boundaries in CZTS and CZTSSe Thin Film Solar Cells with Scanning Probe Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
202
2
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
202
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, for high efficiency solar cells the processes used for CIGS solar cells will need to be tuned. The buffer layer, in particular, will have to be tailored in order to adjust the lattice-matching, the valence and band offsets with CZTS; -the grain boundaries (GB) seem to have the same beneficial properties for CZTS as for CIGS, such as enhanced minority carrier collection taking place at the GB [30].…”
Section: Advantages Of Cztsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for high efficiency solar cells the processes used for CIGS solar cells will need to be tuned. The buffer layer, in particular, will have to be tailored in order to adjust the lattice-matching, the valence and band offsets with CZTS; -the grain boundaries (GB) seem to have the same beneficial properties for CZTS as for CIGS, such as enhanced minority carrier collection taking place at the GB [30].…”
Section: Advantages Of Cztsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since current thin-film technologies mostly rely on polycrystalline materials, physical properties of extended defects, especially grain boundaries (GBs) have been investigated to understand their effects on the device efficiency [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Other extended defects like stacking faults (SFs) and antisite domain boundaries (ADBs) have been less documented as compared to the GBs, but since SFs in CdTe act as electron barriers and reduce the efficiency [17][18][19][20], SFs in CZTS should be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the average roughness of Sb2Se3 film is 23 nm, while the average surface potential difference is a very low (much below kT) 9.1 mV. The surface potential fluctuations are extremely small compared to CIGS and CZTS films (generally >100 mV in a 2.5 μm x 2.5 μm zone 9,25 ). In an illustrative line scan crossing the GBs (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Typical examples are the carefully engineered Cu deficient GBs in CIGS solar cells 23,24 and a high temperature CdCl2 treatment for CdTe solar cells 24,25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%