2013
DOI: 10.1108/13683041311311356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the structural relationship between loyalty programme service quality, satisfaction and loyalty for retail loyalty programmes: evidence from Malaysia

Abstract: PurposeRetaining and cultivating customer loyalty has become increasingly important for loyalty programme providers and retailers due to the highly competitive environment. The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a model investigating how loyalty programme service quality (LPSQual) enhances programme perceived value and programme satisfaction to win loyalty among cardholders.Design/methodology/approachQuota sampling technique, using a self‐administered questionnaire survey, was used with a total of 40… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ali & Karim (2011) recognized several industries like aviation, hotel and hospitality and retail businesses have implemented these programmes on a large scale. The use of loyalty programmes is a key strategy for building relationships with consumers and retaining them over time (Omar et al, 2013). Businesses that implement loyalty programmes have gained in the form of increased sales, profits, customer loyalty, the ability to fend off their direct rivals, customer networking and most importantly customer retention (Dowling & Uncles, 1997; Kumar & Shah, 2004;Ali & Karim, 2011).…”
Section: Loyalty Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali & Karim (2011) recognized several industries like aviation, hotel and hospitality and retail businesses have implemented these programmes on a large scale. The use of loyalty programmes is a key strategy for building relationships with consumers and retaining them over time (Omar et al, 2013). Businesses that implement loyalty programmes have gained in the form of increased sales, profits, customer loyalty, the ability to fend off their direct rivals, customer networking and most importantly customer retention (Dowling & Uncles, 1997; Kumar & Shah, 2004;Ali & Karim, 2011).…”
Section: Loyalty Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire comprised statements describing customers' attitudes and opinions on the three groups of perceived benefits from loyalty programs and the three relationship quality constructs. Statements were obtained from previously tested and validated questions from the literature (Amos et al, 2015;Bridson et al, 2008;Corbishley, 2017;Evanschitzky et al, 2011;Feiler et al, 2012;Garcia-Gómez et al, 2012;Kreis & Mafael, 2014;Liu et al, 2011;Mägi, 2003;Melancon et al, 2010;Mimouni-Chabaane & Volle, 2010;Omar et al, 2013;Vesel & Zabkar, 2010a;Vesel & Zabkar, 2009;White & Peloza, 2009;Winters & Ha, 2012). Statements were measured using a seven-point Likert-type scale, ranging from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (7), to measure statements related to the perception of benefits and RQ constructs.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined the nature of relationships in various contexts and aspects, including those between salespeople and customers (Liu et al, 2011), between businesses (Chumpitaz, Caceres & Paparoidamis, 2007;Nyaga & Whipple, 2011), and between consumers and companies (Aurier & Séréde Lanauze, 2012). Only three studies have outlined the structural nature of LPs and examined how their three inherent benefits (altruistic, consumeristic, egoistic) connect with the relationship quality (RQ) constructs of commitment, satisfaction and trust (Omar et al, 2013;Ou et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2015). When customers perceive that they are receiving benefits from the transactions they participate in, they feel that the relationship is of value to them (Mimouni-Chaabane & Volle, 2010;Palmatier et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Store loyalty will be enhanced with the help of loyalty program service quality consisting of factors such as reward, personalization, usefulness of information, quality of communication, courteousness and tangibility. Of these dimensions of quality, all dimension except personalization influence positively the store loyalty indirectly (Omar et al, 2013). Retailers' brand image is also one of the most important aspects in creating the loyalty towards retailers.…”
Section: Customers' Loyalty and Impulse Buyingmentioning
confidence: 99%