2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-020-00355-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Aluminum/Graphene Nano-Platelets Composites Developed by Friction Stir Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of the machine learning model developed in this article, we compared the machine learning prediction results with some random experimental data in the dataset with the prediction results, as shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2. In addition, in order to judge the generalisation ability of the model, we compare the machine learning prediction results with the experimental results outside the dataset [32][33][34][35], as shown in Figure 6. From the above three figures, it can be seen that the machine learning prediction results have small differences with all the similar data, and the MAPE are all within 10%, regardless of whether these data are included In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of the machine learning model developed in this article, we compared the machine learning prediction results with some random experimental data in the dataset with the prediction results, as shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.…”
Section: Interpretable Machine Learning and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of the machine learning model developed in this article, we compared the machine learning prediction results with some random experimental data in the dataset with the prediction results, as shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2. In addition, in order to judge the generalisation ability of the model, we compare the machine learning prediction results with the experimental results outside the dataset [32][33][34][35], as shown in Figure 6. From the above three figures, it can be seen that the machine learning prediction results have small differences with all the similar data, and the MAPE are all within 10%, regardless of whether these data are included In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of the machine learning model developed in this article, we compared the machine learning prediction results with some random experimental data in the dataset with the prediction results, as shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.…”
Section: Interpretable Machine Learning and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above three figures, it can be seen that the machine learning prediction results have small differences with all the similar data, and the MAPE are all within 10%, regardless of whether these data are included In order to verify the accuracy and reliability of the machine learning model developed in this article, we compared the machine learning prediction results with some random experimental data in the dataset with the prediction results, as shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2. In addition, in order to judge the generalisation ability of the model, we compare the ma-chine learning prediction results with the experimental results outside the dataset [32][33][34][35], as shown in Figure 6. From the above three figures, it can be seen that the machine learning prediction results have small differences with all the similar data, and the MAPE are all within 10%, regardless of whether these data are included in the dataset or not.…”
Section: Interpretable Machine Learning and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard precipitates hinder the movement of dislocations to grow further as cracks and improved the fatigue strength. The climb dissociation movement in the tensile-tensile repeated load gets hampered due to the presence of hard ceramic based precipitates [41]. However, adding more SiO 2 particle in to the weld pool reduced the fatigue strength.…”
Section: Fatigue Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…132,133 Poor thermal conductivity and mismatched coefficient of thermal expansion of component materials such as Cu = ∼17ppm K −1 and Si = ∼4ppm K −1 induces high thermo-mechanical stresses and adversely effects the life span and reliability of the smart electronic devices. 134 The focus of modern technical development is on smaller and more efficient technologies which display better thermal management systems. As a result, their greater application in components needing effective thermal control is likely to happen soon.…”
Section: Potential Of Graphene-reinforced Cu and Al Nanocomposites Fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%