2017
DOI: 10.21859/ajlsr-05023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Types and Frequency of Vascular Findings in Pulmonary CT Angiography of Baker females with Pulmonary Complaints in Comparison with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract: Still in many places all over the world including East Azerbaijan Province and particularly in rural areas, women use traditional methods such as using oven and organic fuels (wood, turd) to bake bread. It has been shown that the smoke organic fuels in places with inadequate ventilation for a long term may cause a range of problems in the respiratory system. CT angiography is a good and less invasive method in evaluating pulmonary vascular system. This study tried to compare CT angiography findings in the lung… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical examination, conventional spirometry (FEV1, TLC, and FVC), and pulmonary vascular CT angiography were performed for the patients in both groups. Increased diameter of the bronchial artery, abnormal pulmonary vascular structure, bronchial artery hyper vascularization on radiography, emphysematous alterations in the pulmonary tissue, and reduced FVC and FEV1 were found in the case group in comparison with the control group ( 48 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Physical examination, conventional spirometry (FEV1, TLC, and FVC), and pulmonary vascular CT angiography were performed for the patients in both groups. Increased diameter of the bronchial artery, abnormal pulmonary vascular structure, bronchial artery hyper vascularization on radiography, emphysematous alterations in the pulmonary tissue, and reduced FVC and FEV1 were found in the case group in comparison with the control group ( 48 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%