1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2741::aid-sim703>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis

Abstract: In a meta-analysis of clinical trials, an important issue is whether the treatment benefit varies according to the underlying risk of the patients in the different trials. The usual naive analyses employed to investigate this question use either the observed risk of events in the control groups, or the average risk in the control and treatment groups, as a measure of underlying risk. These analyses are flawed and can produce seriously misleading results. We show how their biases depend on three components of v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
150
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since RA is a progressive disease, disease duration is linked in some way to disease severity [as attested by the related differences in C-reactive protein (CRP) level], and this source of heterogeneity between studies performed at different times should be taken into account when assessing the relative efficacy of treatments in comparison with a common comparator (in our case, placebo) 41 . Such declines in time of disease duration at entry to clinical studies of antirheumatic biotherapies probably reflect the progressively increasing confidence of physicians in the safety of these novel treatments, while being also a probable consequence of international recommendations encouraging institution of active disease management as soon as possible after RA diagnosis 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since RA is a progressive disease, disease duration is linked in some way to disease severity [as attested by the related differences in C-reactive protein (CRP) level], and this source of heterogeneity between studies performed at different times should be taken into account when assessing the relative efficacy of treatments in comparison with a common comparator (in our case, placebo) 41 . Such declines in time of disease duration at entry to clinical studies of antirheumatic biotherapies probably reflect the progressively increasing confidence of physicians in the safety of these novel treatments, while being also a probable consequence of international recommendations encouraging institution of active disease management as soon as possible after RA diagnosis 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two types of heterogeneity that can be found in a meta-analysis have been described previously [15]: the effect heterogeneity resulting from the different interventions across the studies (countries in our case) and the baseline heterogeneity. The latter is a well-known and commonly reported source of variability in the meta-analysis literature [19,21]. Baseline heterogeneity, in our setting, arises when the risks of scrapie observed in the abattoir survey vary in a significant manner across the EU countries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meta-analysis methodologies are well suited to: (1) demonstrate the occurrence of heterogeneity in the way scrapie surveillance is conducted across the EU, and (2) evaluate the performance of the two surveys in the detection of the two types of scrapie. The explanation of the heterogeneity between studies is a logical step and one of increasing importance when conducting meta-analyses [17,19]. For the application of these techniques, we need some measure of effect: odds-ratios, risk-ratios or rateratios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity was a developing theme, starting with testing for heterogeneity using Bayes factors [308]. A paper on underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis in trials of sclerotherapy for cirrhosis continued this theme, but used the freely available general purpose package BUGS which the authors claimed made the technology 'realistically available to applied researchers undertaking meta-analysis' [309]. This work was then developed further [310] with a tutorial on meta-analysis comparing different approaches [311] and a method comparison for explaining heterogeneity in meta analysis [312].…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%