2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291709990778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating vulnerability to eating disorders: biases in emotional processing

Abstract: These results suggest that specific biases in the processing of social cues, cognitions about the self, and also about eating, weight and shape information, may be important in understanding risk and preventing relapse in EDs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In young female dieters with no current or past Axis I disorders, enhanced processing of negative self-beliefs previously shown to be associated with eating disorders predicted scores on the Eating Attitudes Test both cross-sectionally (Pringle, Harmer & Cooper, 2010a) and 12 months later (Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper, 2010b). Not surprisingly, enhanced processing of body weight and shape related self-beliefs also predicted scores on the Eating Attitudes Test, but this finding was much stronger for dieters who also showed enhanced processing of negative self-beliefs (Pringle Harmer & Cooper, 2010a). …”
Section: Self-schema Disturbance and The Eating Disorders: Theoreticamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In young female dieters with no current or past Axis I disorders, enhanced processing of negative self-beliefs previously shown to be associated with eating disorders predicted scores on the Eating Attitudes Test both cross-sectionally (Pringle, Harmer & Cooper, 2010a) and 12 months later (Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper, 2010b). Not surprisingly, enhanced processing of body weight and shape related self-beliefs also predicted scores on the Eating Attitudes Test, but this finding was much stronger for dieters who also showed enhanced processing of negative self-beliefs (Pringle Harmer & Cooper, 2010a). …”
Section: Self-schema Disturbance and The Eating Disorders: Theoreticamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In these cases, the 6-month score for the closest match case on the relevant measure replaces the missing data. This approach has been demonstrated to be highly effective in repeated measures psychiatric research (Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper, 2010) and to be superior to common approaches, such as listwise deletion, regression imputation, and last value carried forward (Elliott & Hawthorne, 2005).…”
Section: Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research consistently shows that eating disorder risk is associated with the perception of ambiguous stimuli to be negatively related to one's appearance (Brockmeyer et al, 2018;Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and self-worth (e.g., Cooper, 2005;Cooper & Cowen, 2009;Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper 2010). Research consistently shows that eating disorder risk is associated with the perception of ambiguous stimuli to be negatively related to one's appearance (Brockmeyer et al, 2018;Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and self-worth (e.g., Cooper, 2005;Cooper & Cowen, 2009;Pringle, Harmer, & Cooper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%