2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation and risk assessment of ethyl carbamate in Chinese Baijiu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of risk control, limitations on the EC levels of alcoholic beverages have been introduced in many countries around the world. The MRLs for EC vary among the different alcoholic beverages, and overall, the values of MRLs increase with higher alcohol content [ 18 ]. This is because ethanol provides sufficient reaction conditions for the formation of EC [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the perspective of risk control, limitations on the EC levels of alcoholic beverages have been introduced in many countries around the world. The MRLs for EC vary among the different alcoholic beverages, and overall, the values of MRLs increase with higher alcohol content [ 18 ]. This is because ethanol provides sufficient reaction conditions for the formation of EC [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOE approach has been applied for the risk assessment of genotoxic and carcinogenic chemicals, such as EC [ 18 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. The MOE was calculated as the ratio of the benchmark dose lower confidence limit of 10% (BMDL 10 ) to the estimated dietary intake of EC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the increasing understanding of the carcinogenicity of EC, many nations, including France, Japan, Canada, and the United States, have specified MRLs for EC in various alcoholic beverages, ranging from 15 to 1000 µg/L, as outlined in Table 1 (Abt et al., 2021; Gowd et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021; Jia, Di, et al., 2022; Tu et al., 2018). At present, there is no uniform international EC limit, and countries still take the Canadian EC limit as the main reference.…”
Section: Limit Standards and Risk Assessment Of Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessment is a process based on science and technology, which consists of four steps: hazard identification, hazard characteristic, exposure assessment, and risk description, including risk descriptions for threshold chemicals and non‐threshold chemicals, as shown in Figure 4. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested the use of the margin of exposure (MOE) to assess health risk and risk management action priorities for non‐threshold chemicals (EC), where lower the MOE value, higher the risk (Chen et al., 2017; Ferreira et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021). Estimated daily intakes (EDIs) were determined for every gender and age group by dividing the EC DIs by the mean body weight of each group (Equation 4) (Jung et al., 2021).…”
Section: Limit Standards and Risk Assessment Of Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%