2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into gas production from natural gas hydrate: A review

Abstract: Natural gas hydrates (NGHs), which extensively exist in sea-floor and permafrost regions, are considered as an alternative energy in the future for the fossil fuels approaching depletion with the gradually increasing energy consumption. Because of the particularity of NGH stabilizing only in the conditions of the high pressure and the low temperature, the exploitation of NGH is distinguished from those of petroleum and natural gas. Researchers over the world are devoting themselves to developing the technologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
262
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 370 publications
(470 reference statements)
0
262
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…efficiency of gas production, lowering the energy consumption, accelerate the gas production, etc. Compared with thermal stimulation or depressurization, the combination technique is proven to be more efficient in natural gas production from NGH reservoirs (Li et al, 2016).…”
Section: Co 2 Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…efficiency of gas production, lowering the energy consumption, accelerate the gas production, etc. Compared with thermal stimulation or depressurization, the combination technique is proven to be more efficient in natural gas production from NGH reservoirs (Li et al, 2016).…”
Section: Co 2 Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the thermodynamic point of view, both pure CO 2 and CH 4 molecules typically form hydrates under corresponding conditions, and the enthalpy of CO 2 hydrate formation (about -57.98 kJ/mol) is lower than that of CH 4 hydrate formation ( -54.49 kJ/mol). It means CO 2 hydrate is more stable than CH 4 hydrate under the same condition of temperature and pressure (Li et al, 2016). Yuan (2012) proposed a conceptual mechanism for CO 2 -CH 4 replacement in hydrate-bearing sediments.…”
Section: Co 2 Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple methods have been proposed and employed to decompose hydrate for gas recovery from the HBS, such as depressurization, thermal stimulation, gas exchange, and the use of hydration inhibitors (such as salts and alcohols) [2,[5][6][7][8]. The above methods have been compared in terms of energy efficiency, economic and technological feasibility, and environmental performance [1,4,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efficient and feasible gas recovery methods for in-situ CH 4 recovery from the hydrate reservoirs have been proposed, such as hot water injection [4,5], in situ combustion [6,7], depressurization [8][9][10][11], inhibitor injection [12,13], CO 2 replacement [14,15] and the combined methods [16][17][18][19][20]. Using these technologies, extensive research on natural gas production from hydrate in field trials has been conducted within the last decade [21][22][23][24][25]. Natural gas has been successfully extracted by injection of hot water and by depressurization at the permafrost reservoir of the Mallik site in Northwest Canada [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%