2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of adsorption and ultrasound assisted desorption of lead (II) and copper (II) on local bentonite: A modelling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The zeolite -UF system effectively treated wastewater containing 320 mg/l of lead at pH 5 6, resulting in removal efficiencies higher than 99.9%. This combined system performed better than most systems that employed adsorbents for lead removal, while it achieved similar lead removal as that obtained by Korkut et al (2010) who used bentonite, that of Malandrino et al (2006) who utilized vermiculite as adsorbent and that of Mouflih et al (2006) who employed natural phosphate. When the combined system of minerals (zeolite, bentonite or vermiculite) -UF was employed for the treatment of wastewater containing 1000 mg/l of Pb(II) at pH 5 6, the removal efficiencies achieved were higher than 98.5% for all mineral concentrations and reached .99.9% when bentonite was employed.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zeolite -UF system effectively treated wastewater containing 320 mg/l of lead at pH 5 6, resulting in removal efficiencies higher than 99.9%. This combined system performed better than most systems that employed adsorbents for lead removal, while it achieved similar lead removal as that obtained by Korkut et al (2010) who used bentonite, that of Malandrino et al (2006) who utilized vermiculite as adsorbent and that of Mouflih et al (2006) who employed natural phosphate. When the combined system of minerals (zeolite, bentonite or vermiculite) -UF was employed for the treatment of wastewater containing 1000 mg/l of Pb(II) at pH 5 6, the removal efficiencies achieved were higher than 98.5% for all mineral concentrations and reached .99.9% when bentonite was employed.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Among these treatment methods, adsorption is an effective method for the removal of metals, provided that low-cost materials are utilized as adsorbents (Bhattacharyya and Gupta, 2008;O'Connell et al, 2008). Materials employed in previous works as adsorbents for lead removal include grape stalk waste, rice husk, sawdust, activated carbon, different types of biomass, wheat bran, natural and modified minerals such as zeolite, bentonite and kaolinite (Martínez et al, 2006;Wong et al, 2003;Taty-Costodes et al, 2003;Abdel-Halim et al, 2003;Zulkali et al, 2006;Lo et al, 1999;Gupta and Rastogi, 2008;Ö zer, 2007;Naseem and Tahir, 2001;Korkut et al, 2010;Gupta and Bhattacharyya, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, among all the methods adsorption is highly effective and economical. Because of low cost, large quantity, and high specific surface area, bentonite was widely used as an efficient novel adsorbent to adsorb heavy metal ions from waste water [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the planning and analysis of the experiments, coded values are usually applied instead of absolute values of the factors . The experiments were carried out using the above‐mentioned methodology as also described elsewhere . The parameters, such as pressure ( x 1 ), temperature ( x 2 ) and solid‐liquid ratio ( x 3 ) were chosen as independent variables and their effect on the oxidation stability was investigated using the 2 3 factorial design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%