Investigation of bioresorbable porous implants based on polylactide and polycaprolactone

Токаев, К. В.; Vasilieva, I.A.; Zyuzya, J.; Grigoriev, T. E.; Токаев, Т. К.; Tokaev, V. K.; Bikbaev, A. S.; Луканина, К. И.; Zagoskin, Ju.D.; Севастьянов, В. И.

doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.3136

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Т.Атақұлов, 1* К.Ержанова, 1 Ә.Сманов, 1 Д.Жүнісхан, 1 А.Толеков, 2 Х.Назаров 1 «Қазақ ұлттық аграрлық зерттеу университеті» коммерциялық емес акционерлік қоғамы, Қазақстан Республикасы, Алматы қ. (E-mail: KEM_707@mail.ru, ashirali.smanov@kaznaru.edu.kz, zh.duks@gmail.com, aidos.tolekov@gmail.com) 2 «Ташкент мемлекеттік аграрлық университеті», Өзбекстан Республикасы, Ташкент қ.…”

Section: ас бұршақты аралық дақыл ретінде өсіру ерекшеліктеріunclassified

“…В связи с дефицитом воды в республике очень мало возможностей для увеличения площади орошаемых земель. Поэтому, одной из актуальных проблем является разработка и внедрение в производство инновационных ресурсосберегающих и влагосберегающих технологии, эффективно и экономно использующих воду [1].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Особенности Возделывания Гороха При Промежуточном Посеве

Атакулов,

Ержанова,

Сманов

et al. 2024

Izdenister natigeler

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

В данной статье приводятся данные интенсивного использования орошаемых земель на юго-востоке Казахстана путем посева промежуточных культур. Научно-исследовательские работы по рациональному использованию поливной пашни проводились на опытно-производственном стационаре научно-производственного образовательного центра ТОО «Байсерке-Агро» на светло-каштановых почвах. Установлено, что в настоящее время фермерские и крестьянские хозяйства Республики интенсивно не используют орошаемые земли в течение теплого времени года. Поле уборки озимых и рано убираемых яровых культур орошаемые земли пустуют до глубокой осени, бесполезно тратятся поливная вода и солнечная активная радиация. С связи с этим нами проведены научно-исследовательские работы по возделыванию гороха, как промежуточную культуру, после уборки озимой пшеницы. На основании проведенных научных исследований по возделыванию гороха при промежуточном посеве показали, что после уборки озимой пшеницы, горох как промежуточная культура дозревают до зерна и способствует получению второго урожая с одного и того же поля. При соблюдении всех агротехнологических работ, рекомендованной нами в этом статье, урожайность зерна гороха можно довести до 22,6 ц/га, тогда как при возделывании гороха в производственных условиях получено всего 19,4 ц/га. Экономические расчеты показали, что, при возделывании гороха как промежуточную культуру после озимой пшеницы, можно получать дополнительную прибыль с одного гектара 154 800 тенге.

show abstract

Section: ас бұршақты аралық дақыл ретінде өсіру ерекшеліктеріunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

Особенности Возделывания Гороха При Промежуточном Посеве

Атакулов,

Ержанова,

Сманов

et al. 2024

Izdenister natigeler

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The lack of an independent power base, financial power and patronage network have earned him the reputation of being outside of the major financial interests and clanbased grouping and thus being a neutral person capable of balancing between the various financial groups and interests that exert a covert and informal control over key economic issues. As Kazakhstan's long-term Foreign Minister, he has been a key architect of its multivectoral foreign policy that seeks to strike a balance between the West, Russia, and China (Tokaev 2007). As a Sinologist, he has the reputation of being 'pro-Chinese' enjoying close personal, academic and political connections with key figures and institutions in China.…”

Section: Anti-china Protests and State-society Contestationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Societal Contestations and Adaptations to the Belt and Road Initiative in Kazakhstan

Davé

2022

The China Question

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

China's launch of the Silk Road Economic Belt, part of its Belt and Road Initiative, has raised hopes as well as anxieties about China's ever widening engagement in economic, political, security and sociocultural spheres and questions about the promised benefits to national economies and to citizens. By embracing China's narrative of BRI as a harmonious model of development and connectivity the Kazakhstani leaders have found themselves in the position of intermediaries between China's objectives and priorities and interests of their own countries. This chapter examines the societal contestations as well as adaptations resulting from the bonhomie between the ruling political elites and anxieties about the rising influence of China among the people by focusing on the debates and contestations around three key issues: 1) The issue of land lease to foreigners 2) the industrial cooperation agreement with China, and 3) the plight of ethnic Kazakhs from China seeking refuge in Kazakhstan. The examination of anti-China protests suggests that 'China' in many ways is a catalyst that has brought to light issues of corruption, weak legal-regulatory framework about how many top-level decisions on economic matters connected to foreign investments and ownership of business are made. 'Anti-China' protests signify a growing contestation between the ruling elites and the people, the lack of trust among the people of their ruling elites and demands for establishing rule of law, transparency, as well as offering protection to ethnic Kazakhs from China who are seeking legal status and protection in Kazakhstan.Political elites in these states have also 'tolerated' the protests to some extent to allow articulation of societal grievances to let off the steam while also seeking to maintain a firm control. The rhetoric of friendship and 'win-win partnership', aimed at cultivating a discourse of harmonious relationship between the two countries and its peoples has thus been a source of widespread societal contestation on the purported benefits of BRI for Kazakhstan which has also facilitated a process of mutual adaptations while creating a space for democratic activism in Kazakhstan.

show abstract