2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of blast-induced cerebrospinal fluid cavitation: Insights from a simplified head surrogate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,50 Interestingly, we found that the helmet has an adverse effect on CSF cavitation: it slightly increased the negative pressure and the percentage of cavitation in CSF. In our recent study, 49 we experimentally observed the CSF cavitation in a simplified head surrogate under blast wave. Using FE simulation, we found that the blast wave initiates two pressure waves in the surrogate model: the outer wave propagating in the skull surrogate and the inner wave propagating across the brain and CSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…25,50 Interestingly, we found that the helmet has an adverse effect on CSF cavitation: it slightly increased the negative pressure and the percentage of cavitation in CSF. In our recent study, 49 we experimentally observed the CSF cavitation in a simplified head surrogate under blast wave. Using FE simulation, we found that the blast wave initiates two pressure waves in the surrogate model: the outer wave propagating in the skull surrogate and the inner wave propagating across the brain and CSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14,51 In our recent study, we used this CSF material model and found good agreement between the predicted contrecoup CSF pressure and the pressure measured in the experiments. 49 The Combat Helmet Shell and Pad Models…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The blast tests were conducted with a 59 mm-diameter shock tube system, as described in ( Nguyen et al, 2019 ). The details of the blast test method has been introduced in our recent study ( Yu et al, 2022 ). The surrogate model was placed at 3.5 mm from the outlet of the shock tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%