2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2901616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of blind tip estimation

Abstract: In this work we study functions for maximum likelihood estimation in blind tip estimation. We will implement the expectation maximization (EM), the stochastic EM, and stochastic approximation EM algortithms to estimate the unknown tip geometry. To demonstrate the functionality of the algorithms we applied it to dilated artificial input signal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, however, the probe shape could have much more complicated shape. There is a classic method to estimate the probe shape from an AFM image without any prior knowledge, called the blind tip reconstruction method [38][39][40]. Since the method does not postulates the shape of the probe, this is much more ambitious and thus a potentially more powerful method.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, however, the probe shape could have much more complicated shape. There is a classic method to estimate the probe shape from an AFM image without any prior knowledge, called the blind tip reconstruction method [38][39][40]. Since the method does not postulates the shape of the probe, this is much more ambitious and thus a potentially more powerful method.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flater et al proposed a systematic way to determine the threshold parameter against noisy AFM images 22 . By approximating mathematical morphology operators by linear operators, Bakucz et al proposed a reconstruction method based on the Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm with the tip shape represented as a hidden variable 29 . Despite these studies, the original BTR is not routinely utilized in the analysis of noisy AFM data, especially for the analysis of HS-AFM data, due to its susceptibility to noise and difficulty in tuning the parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group uses tip characterizer without calibration. This method can extract tip shape from an AFM image by various mathematical algorithms without calibration of the tip characterizer, such as the deconvolution algorithm [ 26 ], expectation maximization (EM) algorithm [ 27 ] and morphological estimation algorithm [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%