2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-020-00794-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Brain Functional Networks in Children Suffering from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 The decreased characteristic path length and increased global efficiency also found in many cross-frequency PAC networks in the large-scale cost of children with ADHD, which is consistent with Cao et al 32 but inconsistent with previous studies. 21,22 Based on event-related phase coherence of face emotional task EEG, Dini et al 37 observed that children suffering from ADHD showed higher clustering coefficient and short characteristic path length in undirected weighted network, and this is completely consistent with the results of our study. ADHD is an extremely heterogeneous disease, and there are few common findings, such as mean clustering coefficient and characteristic path length aspects, across research in the existing structural and functional network studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…20,21 The decreased characteristic path length and increased global efficiency also found in many cross-frequency PAC networks in the large-scale cost of children with ADHD, which is consistent with Cao et al 32 but inconsistent with previous studies. 21,22 Based on event-related phase coherence of face emotional task EEG, Dini et al 37 observed that children suffering from ADHD showed higher clustering coefficient and short characteristic path length in undirected weighted network, and this is completely consistent with the results of our study. ADHD is an extremely heterogeneous disease, and there are few common findings, such as mean clustering coefficient and characteristic path length aspects, across research in the existing structural and functional network studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To reduce the volume conduction effect, we used the current source density (CSD) method (Mitzdorf, 1985). This method obtains the spatial properties of each de-noised channel while neglecting the effect of other channels by utilizing the second spatial derivative of the EEG recorded in that channel (Dini et al, 2020). The CSD toolbox (Sijmen Duineveld, 2022) was used to apply the CSD method to the de-noised data with the medium spline flexibility of m = 4, as delineated by Dini et al (2020) and Fitzgibbon et al (2015).…”
Section: Neuro Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method obtains the spatial properties of each de-noised channel while neglecting the effect of other channels by utilizing the second spatial derivative of the EEG recorded in that channel (Dini et al, 2020). The CSD toolbox (Sijmen Duineveld, 2022) was used to apply the CSD method to the de-noised data with the medium spline flexibility of m = 4, as delineated by Dini et al (2020) and Fitzgibbon et al (2015). Finally, the data obtained after the implementation of CSD were z-normalized across time and down-sampled to 200 Hz to reduce the calculation load.…”
Section: Neuro Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, functional network connectivity (FNC), which is obtained evaluating the temporal dependence over the entire resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) time series (called static functional network connectivity analysis), has been demonstrated to be highly informative to reveal underlying brain connectivity patterns in mental disorders (Mulders et al, 2015; Yan et al, 2019; Dini et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2020; Luo et al, 2021). Previous studies used various features including spatial functional networks, and FNC based on independent component analysis (ICA) to discriminate BPP and SZ from the HC group (Arribas et al, 2010; Dini et al, 2020),(Jafri et al, 2008). Xia et al, in a study investigating functional network features (e.g., clustering coefficient) of BP, SZ, and major depressive disorder, reported that their network features go toward randomized configurations with different degrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying biomarkers from brain functional connectivity derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is a potential supportive/alternative measure for symptom-based clinical features to diagnose/modify treatment for psychiatric disorders (Sendi et al, 2021c) (Stephan et al, 2017;Du et al, 2018bDu et al, , 2020b. Recently, functional network connectivity (FNC), which is obtained evaluating the temporal dependence over the entire resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) time series (called static functional network connectivity analysis), has been demonstrated to be highly informative to reveal underlying brain connectivity patterns in mental disorders (Mulders et al, 2015;Yan et al, 2019;Dini et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2021). Previous studies used various features including spatial functional networks , and FNC based on independent component analysis (ICA) to discriminate BPP and SZ from the HC group (Arribas et al, 2010;Dini et al, 2020), (Jafri et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%