2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-003-0165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of cavitation inception characteristics of hydrofoil sections via a viscous approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional numerical simulation modeling of cavitation bubble collapse can be divided into macroscopic scale, microscopic scale and mesoscopic scale. The macroscopic numerical scale include the finite element method (FEM), 6 finite volume method (FVM), 7 and boundary element method (BEM). 8 However, in the simulation of multiphase flow, the macroscopic models based on the classical partial differential equation numerical simulation need to track or capture the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional numerical simulation modeling of cavitation bubble collapse can be divided into macroscopic scale, microscopic scale and mesoscopic scale. The macroscopic numerical scale include the finite element method (FEM), 6 finite volume method (FVM), 7 and boundary element method (BEM). 8 However, in the simulation of multiphase flow, the macroscopic models based on the classical partial differential equation numerical simulation need to track or capture the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In present 2-D simulation, the Rayleigh-Plesset equation should be revised as [69,70] , (23) where Rbound is the size of the square domain, R is the radius of the 2-D bubble, Pvapor is the pressure inside the gas bubble (simplified as the vapor pressure), and Pbound is the…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the multiphase cavitation problem with conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, both a Navier-Stokes equation and interface equation (such as volume of fluid [20] or level set method [21]) have to be solved simultaneously. Various numerical techniques, including finite element methods [22], finite volume methods [23][24][25][26], diffuse interface models [27], and two- [28,29] and three-dimensional [30,31] boundary element methods, have been employed to simulate microscopic bubble behavior and macroscopic cavitation flows (e.g., cavitation jets and hydrofoil cavitation). However, even with simplified physical models (full cavitation model [32], Schner-Sauer model [33], and Zwart-Gerber-Belamri model [34]), which help to describe the liquid-vapor phase change, cavitation simulation using partial-differential-equation-based numerical methods is computationally demanding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, meshing was carried out between the boundaries and Propeller Blade to determine the accuracy of the model generation. Figure 110 and 111 show the meshing process [117,118,119]. Numerical method: The Propeller Blade of 0.2R and 0.6R were simulated in Fluent 6.3.26.…”
Section: Model Generation In Gambitmentioning
confidence: 99%