2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of combustion characteristics and kinetics of coal gangue with different feedstock properties by thermogravimetric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was also consistent with the proximate analysis that the volatile content of extracted leaves was higher than that of non-extracted leaves. The results of the study were similar to those of Zhang et al (2015) who conducted the study on coal gangue. The results also explained the high ash and fixed carbon of nonextracted leaves' pellets presented in Table 1 very well.…”
Section: Analysis Of Combustion Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was also consistent with the proximate analysis that the volatile content of extracted leaves was higher than that of non-extracted leaves. The results of the study were similar to those of Zhang et al (2015) who conducted the study on coal gangue. The results also explained the high ash and fixed carbon of nonextracted leaves' pellets presented in Table 1 very well.…”
Section: Analysis Of Combustion Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There was considerable difference in these parameters between the extracted and non-extracted leaves' pellets. As shown in Table 3, extracted leaves' pellets exhibited lower ignition and burnout temperature; in other words, extracted leaf pellets are easy to ignite and burn out (Zhang et al 2015). By comparing the maximum burning rate, the average burning rate, and the combustion characteristic index, extracted leaf pellets had a higher value than that of non-extracted.…”
Section: Table 3 Combustion Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, the flammability index for all the samples followed a similar trend. These ranges of reactivity indexes of our blends were found to be higher than those for coal samples, as reported elsewhere . For instance, the Di value for our proposed fuel is 8.33×103, which is higher than the Di values of anthracite and lignite coal, which were 1.41×103 1.41×103.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For coal (0:100), thermal degradation process starts at 320°C, with an initial mass gain arising from the chemisorption of oxygen on coal surface, which will cause the thermal decomposition to happen in increasing temperature [36][37][38] The events of mass loss related to volatile matter combustion (primary combustion) and the char combustion (secondary combustion) are not clearly distinguished ( Fig. 2a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El-Sayed and Mostafa [15] also reported two exothermic peaks in DTA curves during sugarcane decomposition. According to Yuanyuan et al [38], the reactivity of samples can also be predicted by oxygen adsorption behavior, during the early stage of heating. The absence of mass gain in the related region of TG curve for bagasse sample suggests the formation of more unstable carbonoxygen complexes, which are easily desorbed at relatively low temperatures, increasing the reactivity of this biomass during volatiles release.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%