2018
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2018.2849725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Different Servo Motor Designs for Servo Cycle Operations and Loss Minimizing Control Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al, [19] revealed loss reduction and Flieh et. al, demonstrated loss minimization [20] and dead-beat control [21] in addition to self-sensing [22,23], the precursor to using the physics-based dynamics for virtual sensoring [24] following the illustration of optimality in [25] and selfsensoring [26] specifically applied to DC motors.…”
Section: Learning Teachniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al, [19] revealed loss reduction and Flieh et. al, demonstrated loss minimization [20] and dead-beat control [21] in addition to self-sensing [22,23], the precursor to using the physics-based dynamics for virtual sensoring [24] following the illustration of optimality in [25] and selfsensoring [26] specifically applied to DC motors.…”
Section: Learning Teachniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The momentum continued, and the nonlinear output regulation has been further explored by numerous authors including Cheng, Tarn, and Spurgeon [39], Khalil [40], and Wang and Huang [41] across autonomous and nonautonomous systems. The lineage emphasized in this manuscript stems from a heritage in vehicle guidance and control techniques [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] extended to apply to motor controllers [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] This manuscript proposes a preferred instantiation of adaptive and learning systems [28,29] by evaluating the efficacy of motor control techniques based on iterated computational rates and system discretization. The materials and methods in section 2 first describe model discretization and then introduces the two compared: one adaptive and one learning each with interconnected lineage of research in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the combination of the level taken by each factor making the S/N ratio of UMP η 2 largest is A(2)B(3)C(1)D (1). The combination of the level taken by each factor making the S/N ratio of torque fluctuation and S/N ratio of UMP largest is different.…”
Section: Ratio Of Torque Fluctuation η 1 Largest Is A(2)b(3)c(1)d(3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of B and D on the UMP are larger than those on the torque fluctuation, hence the levels taken by factors B and D are to make the UMP smallest. From the above, the levels taken by each factor are A(2)B(3)C(1)D (1). The final optimized structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Calculation Of Ump Optimization Scheme Of the Improved Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation