2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of earthquake behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings having different opening sizes: Experimental studies and numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the energy dissipated by the interband-4 is least in this case. With the damage, the structural capacity decreases, but the structure continues to dissipate energy (damping) with the opening and closing phenomena of the crack (Kayirga & Altun, 2021) and with frictional energy loss due to the sliding mechanism at the interface.…”
Section: Hysteresis Behavior and Energy Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the energy dissipated by the interband-4 is least in this case. With the damage, the structural capacity decreases, but the structure continues to dissipate energy (damping) with the opening and closing phenomena of the crack (Kayirga & Altun, 2021) and with frictional energy loss due to the sliding mechanism at the interface.…”
Section: Hysteresis Behavior and Energy Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this two-story building is to accommodate and incubate startup companies of various sizes. The reasons for the cracks on the building surface [26] are irregular stress from a long-term overload [27], deformation and corrosion by the weather conditions [28], decrease in bearing capacity [29] and damage from earthquakes [30]. The dimensions of cracks numbered in Input Image 1 of Figure 10 was as follows: (1, 4, and 5) circular shape with radius of 3 to 5 mm; (2) 20 cm long and 1 cm wide; and (3) triangular shape with a base of 2 cm and a height of 2 cm.…”
Section: Contour Detector For Crack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 cm and 4 mm, (2) 9 cm and 8 mm, (3) 15 cm and 10 mm, (4) 3 cm and 6 mm, (5) 12 cm and 3 mm, and (6) 7 cm and 3 mm. are irregular stress from a long-term overload [27], deformation and corrosion by the weather conditions [28], decrease in bearing capacity [29] and damage from earthquakes [30]. The dimensions of cracks numbered in Input Image 1 of Figure 10 In the case of the Sobel detector, the detection results were not reliable when the texture of the wall was not smooth (see Figure 11).…”
Section: Contour Detector For Crack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common modifications suffered by historical masonry buildings concerns the change in the arrangement of the openings in the load-bearing or bracing walls, often due to separations or mergers of different apartments in the same building or even to extensive renovations of private properties up to the addition of one or more floors. These types of building works, that fall within the complex urban phenomena of the last century, often caused structural irregularities involving the seismic response of the building (Parisi and Augenti 2013, Cattari et al 2022, Shariq 2008, Kayırga and Altun 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%